Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35943792›Full record

ReviewJMIR serious games2022

The Effectiveness of Serious Games in Improving Memory Among Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Alaa Abd-Alrazaq, Dari Alhuwail, Eiman Al-Jafar, Arfan Ahmed, Farag Shuweihdi, Shuja Mohd Reagu, Mowafa Househ

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMIR serious games, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Exergaming for dementia and mild cognitive impairment.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alaa Abd-AlrazaqAI Center for Precision Health, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7695-4626
Dari AlhuwailInformation Science Department, Kuwait University, Kuwait, Kuwait.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5038-3044
Eiman Al-JafarKuwait Health Informatics Association, Kuwait, Kuwait.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0063-5466
Arfan AhmedAI Center for Precision Health, Weill Cornell Medicine-Qatar, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4025-5767
Farag ShuweihdiLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1199-2992
Shuja Mohd ReaguMental Health Services, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0801-4653
Mowafa HousehDivision of Information and Computing Technology, College of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Qatar Foundation, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3648-6271

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMemory, one of the main cognitive functions, is known to decline with age. Serious games have been used for improving memory in older adults. The effectiveness of serious games in improving memory has been assessed by many studies. To draw definitive conclusions about the effectiveness of serious games, the findings of these studies need to be pooled and aggregated.

objectiveThis study aimed to assess the effectiveness of serious games in improving memory in older adults with cognitive impairment.

methodsA systematic review of randomized controlled trials was carried out. The search sources included 8 databases, the reference lists of the included studies and relevant reviews, and the studies that cited the included studies. In total, 2 reviewers (AA and MH) independently carried out the study selection, data extraction, risk of bias assessment, and quality of evidence appraisal. Extracted data were synthesized using a narrative approach and a statistical approach (ie, multilevel meta-analysis), as appropriate.

resultsOf the 618 citations retrieved, 18 (2.9%) met the eligibility criteria for this review. Of these 18 studies, 15 (83%) randomized controlled trials were included in 10 multilevel meta-analyses. We found that serious games were more effective than no or passive interventions in improving nonverbal memory (P=.02; standardized mean difference [SMD]=0.46, 95% CI 0.09-0.83) and working memory (P=.04; SMD=0.31, 95% CI 0.01-0.60) but not verbal memory (P=.13; SMD=0.39, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.89). The review also showed that serious games were more effective than conventional exercises in improving verbal memory (P=.003; SMD=0.46, 95% CI 0.16-0.77) but not nonverbal memory (P=.30; SMD=-0.19, 95% CI -0.54 to 0.17) or working memory (P=.99; SMD=0.00, 95% CI -0.45 to 0.45). Serious games were as effective as conventional cognitive activities in improving verbal memory (P=.14; SMD=0.66, 95% CI -0.21 to 1.54), nonverbal memory (P=.94; SMD=-0.01, 95% CI -0.32 to 0.30), and working memory (P=.08; SMD=0.37, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.78) among older adults with cognitive impairment. Finally, the effect of adaptive serious games on working memory was comparable with that of nonadaptive serious games (P=.08; SMD=0.18, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.37).

conclusionsSerious games have the potential to improve verbal, nonverbal, and working memory in older adults with cognitive impairment. However, our findings should be interpreted cautiously given that most meta-analyses were based on a few studies (≤3) and judged to have a low quality of evidence. Therefore, serious games should be offered as a supplement to existing proven and safe interventions rather than as a complete substitute until further, more robust evidence is available. Future studies should investigate the short- and long-term effects of serious games on memory and other cognitive abilities among people of different age groups with or without cognitive impairment.

Indexed as

Alzheimer diseasecognitive trainingdementiaexergamesmemorymeta-analysismild cognitive impairmentmobile phoneserious gamessystematic reviews

Identifiers

PMID35943792
PMCPMC9399845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.