ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2022
Predicting Mortality in Intensive Care Unit Patients With Heart Failure Using an Interpretable Machine Learning Model: Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 136 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
136 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review of machine learning algorithms for mortality risk, readmission and phenotype prediction in patients with heart failure: exploring key data sources, input variables and outcomes.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluation of machine learning methods for prediction of heart failure mortality and readmission: meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Predictive Value of Machine Learning for the Risk of In-Hospital Death in Patients With Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical cardiology · 2025Pooled it
- Development and Validation of Machine Learning-Based Models to Predict In-Hospital Mortality in Life-Threatening Ventricular Arrhythmias: Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Trial
- Using interpretable machine learning models to predict the occurrence of severe influenza in hospitalized children: a retrospective cohort study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based prediction model for predicting the impact of insulin resistance on the risk of ischemic cardiomyopathy.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- A Multidisciplinary Team-Based Large Language Model Framework for Predicting Postoperative Neurological Complications in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: Model Development and Validation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Real-world analysis of depression-related adverse events associated with the adsorbed anthrax vaccine: integrating pharmacovigilance signals, machine learning risk prediction, and transcriptomic mechanisms.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2026Article
- Development and internal validation of an ICU mortality prediction model for patients with concurrent sepsis and heart failure: a retrospective cohort study based on eICU-CRD.Cardiovascular diabetology. Endocrinology reports · 2026Article
- Comparative study on the predictive value of PNI and GNRI for all-cause mortality rates of elderly patients in cardiac care unit and cardiovascular intensive care unit.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Observational
- Machine Learning for Preoperative Prediction of Intraoperative Hypothermia in Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2026Article
- Contribution of resting pulse rate to fall risk prediction in patients with glaucoma: a nationwide retrospective study based on an XGBoost model.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Differentiating advanced from non-advanced hepatic fibrosis: a hybrid deep learning-radiomics model leveraging synthetic contrast-enhanced CT from CycleGAN.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Nonlinear correlation between lactate levels and 28-day all-cause mortality in patients with sepsis complicated by acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS): a retrospective study based on the MIMIC-IV database.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Multicenter machine learning model for assessing the impact of malignancy on in-hospital mortality in heart failure patients: a clinical decision support system with interpretable artificial intelligence.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- MRI-based habitat and peritumoral radiomics for predicting HER2 status in breast cancer: a multicenter study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Early prediction of in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with heart failure using an interpretable machine learning model: a retrospective study based on MIMIC-IV.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Malnutrition Severity Drives Mortality in Geriatric Heart Failure: A Multicenter Extreme Gradient Boosting Analysis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
76 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHeart failure (HF) is a common disease and a major public health problem. HF mortality prediction is critical for developing individualized prevention and treatment plans. However, due to their lack of interpretability, most HF mortality prediction models have not yet reached clinical practice.
objectiveWe aimed to develop an interpretable model to predict the mortality risk for patients with HF in intensive care units (ICUs) and used the SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) method to explain the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model and explore prognostic factors for HF.
methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we achieved model development and performance comparison on the eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD). We extracted data during the first 24 hours of each ICU admission, and the data set was randomly divided, with 70% used for model training and 30% used for model validation. The prediction performance of the XGBoost model was compared with three other machine learning models by the area under the curve. We used the SHAP method to explain the XGBoost model.
resultsA total of 2798 eligible patients with HF were included in the final cohort for this study. The observed in-hospital mortality of patients with HF was 9.97%. Comparatively, the XGBoost model had the highest predictive performance among four models with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.824 (95% CI 0.7766-0.8708), whereas support vector machine had the poorest generalization ability (AUC=0.701, 95% CI 0.6433-0.7582). The decision curve showed that the net benefit of the XGBoost model surpassed those of other machine learning models at 10%~28% threshold probabilities. The SHAP method reveals the top 20 predictors of HF according to the importance ranking, and the average of the blood urea nitrogen was recognized as the most important predictor variable.
conclusionsThe interpretable predictive model helps physicians more accurately predict the mortality risk in ICU patients with HF, and therefore, provides better treatment plans and optimal resource allocation for their patients. In addition, the interpretable framework can increase the transparency of the model and facilitate understanding the reliability of the predictive model for the physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.