Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35943676›Full record

ArticlePituitary2022

Generating novel pituitary datasets from open-source imaging data and deep volumetric segmentation.

Rachel Gologorsky, Edward Harake, Grace von Oiste, Mustafa Nasir-Moin, William Couldwell, Eric Oermann, Todd Hollon

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pituitary, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel GologorskyDepartment of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Pl, 10029, New York, NY, USA.
Edward HarakeDepartment of Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, 48109, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Grace von OisteDepartment of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Health System, 530 First Ave, 10016, New York, NY, USA.
Mustafa Nasir-MoinDepartment of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Health System, 530 First Ave, 10016, New York, NY, USA.
William CouldwellDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, 201 Presidents' Cir, 84132, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Eric OermannDepartment of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Health System, 530 First Ave, 10016, New York, NY, USA.
Todd HollonMachine Learning in Neurosurgery Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, 48109, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. tocho@med.umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5987-6531
NYU Langone Health · USUniversity of Michigan · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

Neurosurgery Research and Education Foundation Neurosurgery Research and Education Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe estimated incidence of pituitary adenomas in the general population is 10-30%, yet radiographic diagnosis remains a challenge. Diagnosis is complicated by the heterogeneity of radiographic features in both normal (e.g. complex anatomy, pregnancy) and pathologic states (e.g. primary endocrinopathy, hypophysitis). Clinical symptoms and laboratory testing are often equivocal, which can result in misdiagnosis or unnecessary specialist referrals. Computer vision models can aid in pituitary adenoma diagnosis; however, a major challenge to model development is the lack of dedicated pituitary imaging datasets. We hypothesized that deep volumetric segmentation models trained to extract the sellar and parasellar region from existing whole-brain MRI scans could be used to generate a novel dataset of pituitary imaging.

methodsSix open-source whole-brain MRI datasets, created for research purposes, were included for model development. Deep learning-based volumetric segmentation models were trained using 318 manually annotated MRI scans from a single open-source MRI dataset. Out-of-distribution volumetric segmentation performance was then tested on 418 MRIs from five held-out research datasets.

resultsOn our annotated images, agreement between manual and model volumetric segmentations was high. Dice scores (a measure of overlap) ranged 0.76-0.82 for both in-distribution and out-of-distribution model testing. In total, 6,755 MRIs from six data sources were included in the final generated pituitary dataset.

conclusionsWe present the first and largest dataset of pituitary imaging constructed using existing MRI data and deep volumetric segmentation models trained to identify sellar and parasellar anatomy. The model generalizes well across patient populations and MRI scanner types. We hope our pituitary dataset will be an integral part of future machine learning research on pituitary pathologies.

Indexed as

HypophysitisPituitary DiseasesPituitary NeoplasmsFemaleHumansNeuroimagingPituitary GlandPregnancyComputer visionDataset generationMagnetic resonance imagingPituitary glandVolumetric segmentation

Identifiers

PMID35943676
OpenAlexW4293323529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.