Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35943665›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI research2022

Assessing the accuracy of [

Jacob Ingvar, Erland Hvittfeldt, Elin Trägårdh, Athanasios Simoulis, Anders Bjartell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Efficacy of [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. To see clear is not enough; it is the action that counts.Translational andrology and urology · 2024
    Article
  15. PET/CT imaging 2 h after injection of [European journal of hybrid imaging · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jacob IngvarDepartment of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden. Jacob.ingvar@skane.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7372-2598
Erland HvittfeldtDepartment of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Jan Waldenströmsgata 5, 205 02, Malmö, Sweden.
Elin TrägårdhDepartment of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Jan Waldenströmsgata 5, 205 02, Malmö, Sweden.
Athanasios SimoulisDepartment of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Jan Waldenströmsgata 5, 205 02, Malmö, Sweden.
Anders BjartellDepartment of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Lund University · SE

Funding

Cancerfonden #CAN 2018/522
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background[

objectiveOur aim was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of [ DESIGN, SETTING AND

participantsThe study was a retrospective cohort in a tertiary referral center. Men with prostate cancer that underwent surgical treatment for intermediate- or high-risk prostate cancer between May 2019 and August 2021 were included.

interventions[ OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Sensitivity and specificity were calculated both for the entire cohort and for patients with lymph node metastasis ≥ 3 mm. Positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values were calculated. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Among 104 patients included in the analyses, 26 patients had lymph node metastasis based on pathology reporting and metastases were ≥ 3 mm in size in 13 of the cases (50%). In the entire cohort, the sensitivity and specificity of [

conclusionsIn primary staging of intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer, [

Indexed as

Lymph node dissectionMetastasesPET/CTProstate cancerRobotic surgeryStaging

Identifiers

PMID35943665
PMCPMC9363552
OpenAlexW4291019433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.