Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35943118›Full record

ArticleJournal of forensic sciences2022

Use of strontium isotope ratios in geolocation of Guatemalan population: Potential role in identification of remains.

Ryan Austin, Gillian Fowler, Jonathan J Cooper, Marco Perez Tanchez, Ruth Croxton, Jane Evans, David F Thompson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of forensic sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ryan AustinSchool of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, Plymouth Marjon University, Plymouth, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3800-3250
Gillian FowlerSchool of Life Sciences, Lincoln University, Joseph Banks Laboratories, Lincoln, UK.
Jonathan J CooperSchool of Life Sciences, Lincoln University, Joseph Banks Laboratories, Lincoln, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9014-4395
Marco Perez TanchezSchool of Life Sciences, Lincoln University, Joseph Banks Laboratories, Lincoln, UK.
Ruth CroxtonDepartment of Applied Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4027-7077
Jane EvansNatural Environmental Isotope Facility, British Geological Survey, Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3667-494X
David F ThompsonSchool of Chemical and Physical Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2834-0109
University of Lincoln · GBBritish Geological Survey · GBKeele University · GBNorthumbria University · GBPlymouth Marjon University · GB

Funding

University of Lincoln Joseph Banks PhD Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within post-conflict communities, attempts to identify and repatriate unidentified and missing individuals poses a difficult task. As current forensic strategies commonly lack the capacity to provide region of origin assessments, forensic anthropologists/investigators are often unable to identify sources of DNA for kinship analysis. Using Thermal Ionization Mass Spectrometry (TIMS), hair samples from 10 volunteers were used to assess the variation in strontium isotope ratios (

Indexed as

MonensinStrontium IsotopesCitiesHairHumansMass SpectrometryStrontiumMonensinStrontiumStrontium Isotopesforensic anthropologygeolocationGuatemalahairhuman provenancingregion of originstrontium isotopesthermal ionization mass spectrometryTIMS

Identifiers

PMID35943118
PMCPMC9542264
OpenAlexW4294125948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.