Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35943079›Full record

ArticleThe Eurasian journal of medicine2022

Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Competition (TEKNOFEST-2021): Stroke Data Set.

Ural Koç, Ebru Akçapınar Sezer, Yaşar Alper Özkaya, Yasin Yarbay, Onur Taydaş, Veysel Atilla Ayyıldız, Hüseyin Alper Kızıloğlu, Uğur Kesimal, İmran Çankaya, Muhammed Said Beşler and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Eurasian journal of medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Ural KoçDepartment of Radiology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Ebru Akçapınar SezerDepartment of Computer Engineering, Artificial Intelligence Division, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Yaşar Alper ÖzkayaTelemedicine and Teleradiology, Simplex IT, Inc, Ankara, Türkiye.
Yasin YarbayGeneral Directorate of Health Information Systems, Ministry of Health, Ankara, Türkiye.
Onur TaydaşDepartment of Radiology, Sakarya University Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya, Türkiye.
Veysel Atilla AyyıldızDepartment of Radiology, Isparta Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Medicine, Isparta, Türkiye.
Hüseyin Alper KızıloğluDepartment of Radiology, GOP University, Faculty of Medicine, Tokat, Türkiye.
Uğur KesimalDepartment of Radiology, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
İmran ÇankayaDepartment of Radiology, Van Training and Research Hospital, Van, Türkiye.
Muhammed Said BeşlerDepartment of Radiology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Emrah KarakaşGeneral Directorate of Health Information Systems, Ministry of Health, Ankara, Türkiye.
Fatih KarademirHealth Institutes of Türkiye, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Nihat Barış SebikGeneral Directorate of Health Information Systems, Ministry of Health, Ankara, Türkiye.
Murat BahadırDepartment of Computer Engineering, Konya Technical University Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Konya, Türkiye.
Özgür SezerGeneral Directorate of Health Information Systems, Ministry of Health, Ankara, Türkiye.
Batuhan YeşilyurtHealth Institutes of Türkiye, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Songul VarlıHealth Institutes of Türkiye, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Erhan AkdoğanHealth Institutes of Türkiye, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Mustafa Mahir ÜlgüGeneral Directorate of Health Information Systems, Ministry of Health, Ankara, Türkiye.
Şuayip BirinciMinistry of Health, Ankara, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe artificial intelligence competition in healthcare was organized for the first time at the annual aviation, space, and technology festival (TEKNOFEST), Istanbul/Türkiye, in September 2021. In this article, the data set preparation and competition processes were explained in detail; the anonymized and annotated data set is also provided via official website for further research. MATERIALS AND

methodsData set recorded over the period covering 2019 and 2020 were centrally screened from the e-Pulse and Teleradiology System of the Republic of Türkiye, Ministry of Health using various codes and filtering criteria. The data set was anonymized. The data set was prepared, pooled, curated, and annotated by 7 radiologists. The training data set was shared with the teams via a dedicated file transfer protocol server, which could be accessed using private usernames and passwords given to the teams under a nondisclosure agreement signed by the representative of each team.

resultsThe competition consisted of 2 stages. In the first stage, teams were given 192 digital imaging and communications in medicine images that belong to 1 of 3 possible categories namely, hemorrhage, ischemic, or non-stroke. Teams were asked to classify each image as either stroke present or absent. In the second stage of the competition, qualifying 36 teams were given 97 digital imaging and communications in medicine images that contained hemorrhage, ischemia, or both lesions. Among the employed methods, Unet and DeepLabv3 were the most frequently observed ones.

conclusionArtificial intelligence competitions in healthcare offer good opportunities to collect data reflecting various cases and problems. Especially, annotated data set by domain experts is more valuable.

Identifiers

PMID35943079
PMCPMC9797774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.