Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35943031›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics2022

Diagnostic experiences of Duchenne families and their preferences for newborn screening: A mixed-methods study.

Norah L Crossnohere, Niki Armstrong, Ryan Fischer, John F P Bridges

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Diagnostic experiences of Duchenne families and their preferences for newborn screening: A mixed-methods study.American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Norah L CrossnohereDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2811-1330
Niki ArmstrongParent Project Muscular Dystrophy, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9247-0581
Ryan FischerParent Project Muscular Dystrophy, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
John F P BridgesDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Duchenne muscular dystrophy is the most common form of muscular dystrophy diagnosed in childhood but is not routinely screened for prenatally or at birth in the United States. We sought to characterize the diagnostic experiences of families and describe their preferences for newborn screening (NBS). We conducted a registry-based survey of families with Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy that included open- and closed-ended questions regarding the journey to a diagnosis, preferences for when to learn of a diagnosis, and how knowledge of a diagnosis would impact life decisions. Open-ended responses were analyzed thematically, and closed-ended responses were analyzed descriptively. Sixty-five families completed the survey. The average ages of first concern and diagnosis were 2 and 4 years, respectively. One-third of families (30%) indicated that they would prefer to receive a diagnosis in the newborn period irrespective of treatment options available, and nearly all of the remaining families (93%) indicated that they would want to learn about a diagnosis if there were treatments that worked well during the newborn period. All families (100%) indicated that a diagnosis in the newborn period would impact life decisions. We identified three overarching themes, which described the stages of the diagnostic journey, including having concerns about the child, seeking answers, and receiving the diagnosis. NBS can facilitate improved health outcomes through early access to care, and inform families on major health and nonhealth decisions. The preferences and experiences of families and other stakeholders should be considered when determining the potential value and benefit of expanding NBS programs.

Indexed as

Muscular Dystrophy, DuchenneNeonatal ScreeningChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfant, NewbornSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statesdiagnostic odysseyDuchenne muscular dystrophynewborn screeningpreferences

Identifiers

PMID35943031
PMCPMC9804254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.