ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2022
Quality and Performance Measurement in Primary Diabetes Care: A Qualitative Study in Urban China.
Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Construction, operations, and sustainability of maternal and child health pharmacy clinics in China: a national multicenter cross-sectional survey.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Evaluating the use of the consolidated framework for implementation research in primary care settings: a systematic review.Implementation science communications · 2026Review
- Management capacity for stable coronary heart disease in Shanghai community medical institutions: a cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- A Composite Indicator for Primary Diabetes Care: A Cross-Sectional Study in Hungary.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Key Motivators and Framework for Integrated Care by Family Physician Team Members in Urban China.International journal of health policy and management · 2025Article
- Organizational culture and turnover intention among primary care providers: a multilevel study in four large cities in China.Global health action · 2024Article
- Sustainable Implementation of Physician-Pharmacist Collaborative Clinics for Diabetes Management in Primary Healthcare Centers: A Qualitative Study.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2024Article
- Type 1 and type 2 diabetes mortality burden: Predictions for 2030 based on Bayesian age-period-cohort analysis of China and global mortality burden from 1990 to 2019.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2024Article
- The impact of hypertension follow-up management on the choices of signing up family doctor contract services: does socioeconomic status matter?BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Quality Measurement in Shanghai From a Global Perspective; A Response to Recent Commentaries.International journal of health policy and management · 2024Article
- Rethinking the path from evidence to decision-making.Israel journal of health policy research · 2023Review
- Rethinking Performance Measurement of Primary Care in China Comment on "Quality and Performance Measurement in Primary Diabetes Care: A Qualitative Study in Urban China".International journal of health policy and management · 2023Article
- Quality Measurement as a Path to High Quality Care Comment on "Quality and Performance Measurement in Primary Diabetes Care: A Qualitative Study in Urban China".International journal of health policy and management · 2023Article
- Stakeholders' Perceived Barriers and Successes of Quality Improvement Programs for Patients With Diabetes Comment on "Quality and Performance Measurement in Primary Diabetes Care: A Qualitative Study in Urban China".International journal of health policy and management · 2023Article
- The Performance of Primary Healthcare in China: The Need for a Systematic Design for Improvement Comment on "Quality and Performance Measurement in Primary Diabetes Care: A Qualitative Study in Urban China".International journal of health policy and management · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundQuality measurements in primary healthcare (PHC) have become an essential component for improving diabetes outcomes in many high-income countries. However, little is known about their implementation within the Chinese health-system context and how they are perceived by patients, physicians, and policy-makers. We examined stakeholders' perceptions of quality and performance measurements for primary diabetes care in Shanghai, China, and analyzed facilitators and barriers to implementation.
methodsIn-depth interviews with 26 key stakeholders were conducted from 2018 to 2019. Participants were sampled from two hospitals, four community healthcare centers (CHCs), and four institutes involved in regulating CHCs. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) guided data analysis.
resultsExisting quality measurements were uniformly implemented via a top-down process, with daily monitoring of family doctors' work and pay-for-performance incentives. Barriers included excluding frontline clinicians from indicator planning, a lack of transparent reporting, and a rigid organizational culture with limited bottom-up feedback. Findings under the CFIR construct "organizational incentives" suggested that current pay-for-performance incentives function as a "double-edged sword," increasing family doctors' motivation to excel while creating pressures to "game the system" among some physicians. When considering the CFIR construct "reflecting and evaluating," policy-makers perceived the online evaluation application - which provides daily reports on family doctors' work - to be an essential tool for improving quality; however, this information was not visible to patients. Findings included under the "network and communication" construct showed that specialists support the work of family doctors by providing training and patient consultations in CHCs.
conclusionThe quality of healthcare could be considerably enhanced by involving patients and physicians in decisions on quality measurement. Strengthening hospital-community partnerships can improve the quality of primary care in hospital-centric systems. The case of Shanghai provides compelling policy lessons for other health systems faced with the challenge of improving PHC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.