Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35942952›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

SMAD4 and TGFβ are architects of inverse genetic programs during fate determination of antiviral CTLs.

Karthik Chandiran, Jenny E Suarez-Ramirez, Yinghong Hu, Evan R Jellison, Zeynep Ugur, Jun Siong Low, Bryan McDonald, Susan M Kaech, Linda S Cauley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Autoregulated splicing ofScience (New York, N.Y.) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Editorial: TGF-β and T cell biology.Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. CTLs Get SMAD When Pathogens Tell Them Where to Go.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Karthik ChandiranDepartment of Immunology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2118-7946
Jenny E Suarez-RamirezDepartment of Immunology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, United States.
Yinghong HuDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory Vaccine Center, Emory University, Atlanta, United States.
Evan R JellisonDepartment of Immunology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, United States.
Zeynep UgurDepartment of Immunology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, United States.
Jun Siong LowDepartment of Immunobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States.
Bryan McDonaldNOMIS Center for Immunobiology and Microbial Pathogenesis, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, United States.
Susan M KaechNOMIS Center for Immunobiology and Microbial Pathogenesis, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, United States.
Linda S CauleyDepartment of Immunology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9488-0341
UConn Health · USSalk Institute for Biological Studies · USEmory University · USYale University · US

Funding

Viral Vector Core (VVC)P30CA014195 · NCI · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI Reuben Shaw · 1985 to 2026
$82.8M
Cellular Mechanisms of Viral ControlR01AI123864 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI CAULEY, LINDA S, KAECH, SUSAN M · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014195NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI123864
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transforming growth factor β (TGFβ) is an important differentiation factor for cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and alters the expression levels of several of homing receptors during infection. SMAD4 is part of the canonical signaling network used by members of the transforming growth factor family. For this study, genetically modified mice were used to determine how SMAD4 and TGFβ receptor II (TGFβRII) participate in transcriptional programming of pathogen-specific CTLs. We show that these molecules are essential components of opposing signaling mechanisms, and cooperatively regulate a collection of genes that determine whether specialized populations of pathogen-specific CTLs circulate around the body, or settle in peripheral tissues. TGFβ uses a canonical SMAD-dependent signaling pathway to downregulate Eomesodermin (EOMES), KLRG1, and CD62L, while CD103 is induced. Conversely, in vivo and in vitro data show that EOMES, KLRG1, CX

Indexed as

Receptor, Transforming Growth Factor-beta Type IISmad4 ProteinT-Lymphocytes, CytotoxicTransforming Growth Factor betaAnimalsCell DifferentiationMiceSignal TransductionReceptor, Transforming Growth Factor-beta Type IISmad4 ProteinSmad4 protein, mouseTgfbr2 protein, mouseTransforming Growth Factor betaCD8 memoryCD8 T cell differentiationCD8 T cellscytotoxic T lymphocyteimmunologyinflammationinfluenza a viruslisteria monocytogenesmouserespiratory virusSMAD4TGFβ

Identifiers

PMID35942952
PMCPMC9402230
OpenAlexW4291016692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.