Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35942508›Full record

ArticleESC heart failure2022

Biomarker prognostication across Universal Definition of Heart Failure stages.

Reza Mohebi, Sean Murphy, Laurel Jackson, Cian McCarthy, Andrew Abboud, Gillian Murtagh, Susan Gawel, Hannah Miksenas, Hanna Gaggin, James L Januzzi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ESC heart failure, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Diagnostic Tests for Stage B Heart Failure.Current cardiology reports · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Association of suPAR, ST2, and galectin-3 with eGFR decline and mortality in patients with advanced heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Reza MohebiCardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Sean MurphyCardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Laurel JacksonMedical and Scientific Affairs, Abbott Diagnostics, Abbott Park, IL, USA.
Cian McCarthyCardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Andrew AbboudCardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Gillian MurtaghMedical and Scientific Affairs, Abbott Diagnostics, Abbott Park, IL, USA.
Susan GawelMedical and Scientific Affairs, Abbott Diagnostics, Abbott Park, IL, USA.
Hannah MiksenasCardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Hanna GagginCardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
James L JanuzziCardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Harvard University · USAbbott Fund · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

Noninvasive Cardiovascular Imaging Research Training ProgramT32HL094301 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Marcelo F DI CARLI · 2010 to 2026
$7.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL094301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe Universal Definition of Heart Failure (UDHF) provides a framework for staging risk for HF events. It is not clear whether prognostic biomarkers have different meaning across UDHF stages. We sought to evaluate performance of biomarkers to predict HF events among high-risk patients undergoing coronary and/or peripheral angiography categorized into UDHF stages.

methodsOne thousand two hundred thirty-five individuals underwent coronary and/or peripheral angiography were enrolled. Study participants were categorized into UDHF Stage A (at risk), Stage B (pre-HF), and Stage C or D (HF, including end stage) and grouped into Stage A/B and C/D. Biomarkers and clinical variables were used to develop prognostic models. Other measures examined included total HF hospitalizations.

resultsOver a median of 3.67 years of follow-up, 155 cardiovascular (CV) deaths occurred, and 299 patients were hospitalized with acute HF. In patients with Stage A/B, galectin-3 (HR = 1.52, P = 0.03), endothelin-1 (HR = 2.16, P = 0.001), and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP; HR = 1.43, P < 0.001) were associated with incident CV death/HF hospitalization. In Stage C/D, NT-proBNP (HR = 1.26, P = 0.006), soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR; HR = 1.57, P = 0.007) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP; HR = 1.15, P = 0.01) were associated with these outcomes. Higher biomarker concentrations were associated with greater total burden of HF events in Stages A/B and C/D.

conclusionsAmong higher risk individuals undergoing angiographic procedures, different biomarkers improve risk stratification in different UDHF stages of HF. More precise prognostication may offer a window of opportunity to initiate targeted preventive measures.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular SystemHeart FailureBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinHospitalizationHumansPrognosisBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinBiomarkerCoronary angiographyHeart failureMortalityRisk model

Identifiers

PMID35942508
PMCPMC9773759
OpenAlexW4290731656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.