ArticleESC heart failure2022
Biomarker prognostication across Universal Definition of Heart Failure stages.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic and prognostic value of circulating biomarkers in heart failure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Sotagliflozin, suPAR, and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes and Heart Failure: A SOLOIST-WHF Ancillary Study.Journal of cardiac failure · 2026Observational
- Diagnostic Tests for Stage B Heart Failure.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- New Biomarkers in the Prognostic Assessment of Acute Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: Beyond Natriuretic Peptides.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Association of suPAR, ST2, and galectin-3 with eGFR decline and mortality in patients with advanced heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research · 2024Article
- Lipoprotein(a), Oxidized Phospholipids, and Progression to Symptomatic Heart Failure: The CASABLANCA Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- Role of Soluble Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor in Cardiovascular Disease.Current cardiology reports · 2023Review
- The Role of Galectin-3 in Heart Failure-The Diagnostic, Prognostic and Therapeutic Potential-Where Do We Stand?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Biomarker prognostication across Universal Definition of Heart Failure stages.ESC heart failure · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
aimThe Universal Definition of Heart Failure (UDHF) provides a framework for staging risk for HF events. It is not clear whether prognostic biomarkers have different meaning across UDHF stages. We sought to evaluate performance of biomarkers to predict HF events among high-risk patients undergoing coronary and/or peripheral angiography categorized into UDHF stages.
methodsOne thousand two hundred thirty-five individuals underwent coronary and/or peripheral angiography were enrolled. Study participants were categorized into UDHF Stage A (at risk), Stage B (pre-HF), and Stage C or D (HF, including end stage) and grouped into Stage A/B and C/D. Biomarkers and clinical variables were used to develop prognostic models. Other measures examined included total HF hospitalizations.
resultsOver a median of 3.67 years of follow-up, 155 cardiovascular (CV) deaths occurred, and 299 patients were hospitalized with acute HF. In patients with Stage A/B, galectin-3 (HR = 1.52, P = 0.03), endothelin-1 (HR = 2.16, P = 0.001), and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP; HR = 1.43, P < 0.001) were associated with incident CV death/HF hospitalization. In Stage C/D, NT-proBNP (HR = 1.26, P = 0.006), soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR; HR = 1.57, P = 0.007) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP; HR = 1.15, P = 0.01) were associated with these outcomes. Higher biomarker concentrations were associated with greater total burden of HF events in Stages A/B and C/D.
conclusionsAmong higher risk individuals undergoing angiographic procedures, different biomarkers improve risk stratification in different UDHF stages of HF. More precise prognostication may offer a window of opportunity to initiate targeted preventive measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.