ArticleCanadian public administration : Administration publique du Canada2022
Le déploiement de la surveillance épidémiologique automatisée du COVID-19 : une analyse comparée de la Corée du Sud et du Canada.
Article in Canadian public administration : Administration publique du Canada, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Le déploiement de la surveillance épidémiologique automatisée du COVID-19 : une analyse comparée de la Corée du Sud et du Canada.Canadian public administration : Administration publique du Canada · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Governments across the world have deployed various surveillance devices to curb the COVID-19 pandemic. Based on literature research on two contrasting cases, South Korea and Canada, this study shows the influence of national context on deploying automated epidemiological surveillance of COVID-19. Beside highlighting food for thought regarding government management of a possible new health crisis, the study shows that civil society can contribute to informing public debate by bringing governments to be transparent in terms of automated epidemiological surveillance. In conclusion, the study stresses the importance of debating surveillance issues outside of health crisis periods to avoid possible excesses caused by the urgent need for action.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.