Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35942448›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Integrating Multiclass Light Weighted BiLSTM Model for Classifying Negative Emotions.

Manisha Bhende, Anuradha Thakare, Bhasker Pant, Piyush Singhal, Swati Shinde, Betty Nokobi Dugbakie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Manisha BhendeMarathwada Mitra Mandal's Institute of Technology, Pune, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2407-8091
Anuradha ThakarePimpri Chinchwad College of Engineering, Pune, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6281-8711
Bhasker PantDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Graphic Era Deemed to be University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6070-5104
Piyush SinghalDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, GLA University, Mathura, UP, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8380-4332
Swati ShindeDepartment of Computer Engineering, Pimpri Chinchwad College of Engineering, Pune, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8271-3025
Betty Nokobi DugbakieDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, KNUST, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5050-400X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the continuous development of social networks, Weibo has become an essential platform for people to share their opinions and feelings in daily life. Analysis of users' emotional tendencies can be effectively applied to public opinion control, public opinion surveys, and product recommendations. However, the traditional deep learning algorithm often needs a large amount of data to be retained to obtain a better accuracy when faced with new work tasks. Given this situation, a multiclassification method of microblog negative sentiment based on MAML (model-agnostic metalearning) and BiLSTM (bidirectional extended short-term memory network) is proposed to represent the microblog text word vectorization and the combination of MAML and BiLSTM is constructed. The model of BiLSTM realizes the classification of negative emotions on Weibo and updates the parameters through machine gradient descent; the metalearner in MAML calculates the sum of the losses of multiple pieces of training, performs a second gradient descent, and updates the metalearner parameters. The updated metalearner can quickly iterate when faced with a new Weibo negative sentiment classification task. The experimental results show that compared with the prepopular model, on the Weibo negative sentiment dataset, the precision rate, recall rate, and F1 value are increased by 1.68 percentage points, 2.86 percentage points, and 2.27 percentage points, respectively.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsEmotionsData CollectionHumansPublic Opinion

Identifiers

PMID35942448
PMCPMC9356814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.