ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022
Application of Intelligent Taste Analysis Based on Random Forest Algorithm in Food Quality Inspection.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Miniaturized Electronic Noses for Food Quality and Safety: Applications in Lipid Oxidation Monitoring.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
- Artificial intelligence in bread making: Applications in quality control, formulation and sensory prediction.Food chemistry: X · 2026Review
- A Review of High-Throughput Optical Sensors for Food Detection Based on Machine Learning.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Food characterization in the omics era: current advances, analytical approaches, and future perspectives.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food safety is a major concern that has an impact on the national economy and people's lives. The food industry has grown in quality and innovation in tandem with the rapid development of the economy and society. The emergence of new food technologies, as well as changes in dietary habits, has increased public concern about food safety. With the emergence of various counterfeit and substandard products, food quality and safety testing have become even more important. Traditional testing methods rely on sensory analysis and physical and chemical analysis. This approach is subjective and poorly adapted to the general public. It requires a high level of technical operation and is difficult to carry out on a large scale. To address this situation, this paper proposes an intelligent approach to food safety quality testing. The core idea is, first, to use sensors to collect data on the various components of the sample to be tested. Second, the random forest (RF) model used in this paper is trained. Third, the trained model is used to classify and identify the test samples. Based on the classification results, a conclusion is drawn as to whether the food product is a variant or a counterfeit. The advantage of this study is that the training model used is a weighted RF algorithm based on mutual information. The correlation between any two decision trees is calculated using mutual information, and for the more correlated decision trees, only the one with the highest evaluation accuracy is retained to form a new RF, and the evaluation accuracy is converted into voting weights, resulting in an RF model with less redundancy and higher evaluation accuracy. The experimental results show that the method used in this paper can successfully identify spoiled or counterfeit products and has good practicality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.