Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35942445›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Application of Intelligent Taste Analysis Based on Random Forest Algorithm in Food Quality Inspection.

Xinghua Zhang, Yongjie Sun, Yongxin Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xinghua ZhangChangchun Sci-Tech University, Changchun 130600, JiLin, China.
Yongjie SunCollege of Life Science, Changchun Sci-Tech University, Changchun 130600, JiLin, China.
Yongxin SunCollege of Physics and Electronic Information, Baicheng Normal University, Baicheng 137000, Jilin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4248-7297

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food safety is a major concern that has an impact on the national economy and people's lives. The food industry has grown in quality and innovation in tandem with the rapid development of the economy and society. The emergence of new food technologies, as well as changes in dietary habits, has increased public concern about food safety. With the emergence of various counterfeit and substandard products, food quality and safety testing have become even more important. Traditional testing methods rely on sensory analysis and physical and chemical analysis. This approach is subjective and poorly adapted to the general public. It requires a high level of technical operation and is difficult to carry out on a large scale. To address this situation, this paper proposes an intelligent approach to food safety quality testing. The core idea is, first, to use sensors to collect data on the various components of the sample to be tested. Second, the random forest (RF) model used in this paper is trained. Third, the trained model is used to classify and identify the test samples. Based on the classification results, a conclusion is drawn as to whether the food product is a variant or a counterfeit. The advantage of this study is that the training model used is a weighted RF algorithm based on mutual information. The correlation between any two decision trees is calculated using mutual information, and for the more correlated decision trees, only the one with the highest evaluation accuracy is retained to form a new RF, and the evaluation accuracy is converted into voting weights, resulting in an RF model with less redundancy and higher evaluation accuracy. The experimental results show that the method used in this paper can successfully identify spoiled or counterfeit products and has good practicality.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsTasteFood QualityHumans

Identifiers

PMID35942445
PMCPMC9356829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.