Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35942216›Full record

ArticlePublic administration2022

The public sector and co-creation in turbulent times: A systematic literature review on robust governance in the COVID-19 emergency.

Fulvio Scognamiglio, Alessandro Sancino, Francesca Caló, Carol Jacklin-Jarvis, James Rees

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public administration, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fulvio ScognamiglioThe Open University Milton Keynes UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2376-5503
Alessandro SancinoThe Open University Milton Keynes UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1892-9622
Francesca CalóThe Open University Milton Keynes UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4755-3959
Carol Jacklin-JarvisThe Open University Milton Keynes UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8542-0914
James ReesUniversity of Wolverhampton Wolverhampton UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0545-782X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The capacity of public sector of co-creating with other stakeholders is challenged by the increasing presence of disruptive turbulent events, such as the COVID-19. At this regard, robustness has been identified as a suitable response to deal with this kind of events. Through a systematic literature review, we analyzed how public sector organizations have co-created with other actors during the COVID-19 and what have been the contribution of robust governance strategies. Our findings point firstly to the empirical validity of the robustness concept, providing evidence of the extensive use of robust governance strategies into the co-creation processes. Second, we identified a configurational approach to robustness, with governments co-creating by simultaneously employing several robust strategies. Thirdly, we observed a more active involvement of societal stakeholders, with emergence of proto-institutions and potential threats to the political system.

Identifiers

PMID35942216
PMCPMC9350016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.