Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35942193›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society)2022

On the use of the reproduction number for SARS-CoV-2: Estimation, misinterpretations and relationships with other ecological measures.

Nicholas P Jewell, Joseph A Lewnard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Are epidemic growth rates more informative than reproduction numbers?Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nicholas P JewellDepartment of Medical Statistics London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8637-9132
Joseph A LewnardDivision of Epidemiology School of Public Health University of California, Berkeley Berkeley California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5417-8475

Funding

Emerging methods and applications for test-negative studies of of infectious disease interventionsR01AI148127 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI JEWELL, NICHOLAS P · 2020 to 2023
$1.8M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI148127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The basic reproduction number,

Indexed as

causationCovid‐19epidemicsinfectious diseasereproductive numbersSARS‐CoV‐2

Identifiers

PMID35942193
PMCPMC9350332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.