Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35942152›Full record

ArticleOxford bulletin of economics and statistics2022

How did consumers react to the COVID-19 pandemic over time?

George Kapetanios, Nora Neuteboom, Feiko Ritsema, Alexia Ventouri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oxford bulletin of economics and statistics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

George KapetaniosKings Business School Kings College London, Bush House 30 Aldwych WC2B 4BG London WC2B 4BG United Kingdom.
Nora NeuteboomKings Business School Kings College London, Bush House 30 Aldwych WC2B 4BG London WC2B 4BG United Kingdom.
Feiko RitsemaABN AMRO Bank Gustav Mahlerlaan 10 Amsterdam 1082 PP Netherlands.
Alexia VentouriKings Business School Kings College London, Bush House 30 Aldwych WC2B 4BG London WC2B 4BG United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8334-4399

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) have been the key policy instrument utilized to contain the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper disentangles the effects of NPIs from that of the virus and looks at the specific channels through which the virus impacts consumption. Using geo-located transaction data, we find that consumers' behaviour towards the virus has explanatory power for the drop in consumption in the early stages of the pandemic. This effect disappears in the later stages of the pandemic, suggesting that consumers have adapted their behaviour. As the COVID-19 pandemic progressed, consumers tended to make 'safer' consumption decisions, by avoiding crowded places.

Identifiers

PMID35942152
PMCPMC9349652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.