Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35942029›Full record

ArticleAgribusiness (New York, N.Y.)2022

Local food in times of crisis: The impact of COVID-19 and two reinforcing primes.

Martina Vecchi, Edward C Jaenicke, Claudia Schmidt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Agribusiness (New York, N.Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Martina VecchiDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Sociology, & Education (AESE) Pennsylvania State University University Park Pennsylvania USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8239-3180
Edward C JaenickeDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Sociology, & Education (AESE) Pennsylvania State University University Park Pennsylvania USA.
Claudia SchmidtDepartment of Agricultural Economics, Sociology, & Education (AESE) Pennsylvania State University University Park Pennsylvania USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using an online survey experiment and a sample of 1650 participants from the Mid-Atlantic region in the United States, we investigate the effects of COVID-19 and two reinforcing primes on preferences for local food and donations to support farmers, farmers markets, and a food-relief program. At the beginning of the survey, we induce a subset of participants to think about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on either their personal life, finances, and health or on their local community and its members. Both primes increase participants' levels of anxiety and slightly reduce their sense of community. Additionally, both primes significantly decrease the hypothetical price premium participants are willing to pay for local food, that is, both for fruits and vegetables and for meat products. The primes do not significantly affect the amount donated to charitable organizations, except when controlling for participants' own experiences with COVID-19. While priming increases donations for some participants, it decreases donations for those with a "strong" COVID-19 experience, especially for the food relief program. [EconLit Citations: C90, Q19].

Indexed as

COVID‐19farmerslocal foodonline experimentpriming

Identifiers

PMID35942029
PMCPMC9350039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.