Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35942016›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2022

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Trifarotene Plus Doxycycline for Severe Acne Vulgaris.

James Q Del Rosso, Sandra Marchese Johnson, Todd Schlesinger, Lawrence Green, Nestor Sanchez, Edward Lain, Zoe Draelos, Jean-Philippe York, Rajeev Chavda

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Management of Acne Vulgaris With Trifarotene.Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgery
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

James Q Del RossoDr. Del Rosso is with JDR Dermatology Research in Las Vegas, Nevada and Advanced Dermatology and Cosmetic Surgery Clinical Research in Maitland. Florida.
Sandra Marchese JohnsonDr. Johnson is with Johnson Dermatology in Fort Smith, Arkansas.
Todd SchlesingerDr. Schlesinger is with the Clinical Research Center of the Carolinas in Charleston, South Carolina.
Lawrence GreenDr. Green is with the George Washington School of Medicine in Washington D.C.
Nestor SanchezDr. Sanchez is with Dermatology and Pathology, at Aibonito Hospital in Aibonito, Puerto Rico.
Edward LainDr. Lain is with the Austin Institute for Clinical Research in Austin, Texas.
Zoe DraelosDr. Draelos is with Dermatology Consulting Services, PLLC in High Point, North Carolina.
Jean-Philippe YorkDr. York is with Galderma Laboratories, LP in Fort Worth, Texas, and Galderma SA in Switzerland.
Rajeev ChavdaDr. Chavda is with Galderma SA in Switzerland.
Advanced Dermatology · USDermatology Consulting Services · USGalderma (Switzerland) · CHGalderma (United States) · USGeorge Washington University · USHouston Institute for Clinical Research · USJohnson & Johnson (United States) · USPuerto Rico Department of Health · PRSouth Carolina Historical Society · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of trifarotene plus oral doxycycline in acne. Methods: This was a randomized (2:1 ratio) 12-week, double-blind study of once-daily trifarotene cream 50µg/g plus enteric-coated doxycycline 120mg (T+D) versus trifarotene vehicle and doxycycline placebo (V+P). Patients were aged 12 years or older with severe facial acne (≥20 inflammatory lesions, 30 to 120 non-inflammatory lesions, and ≤4 nodules). Efficacy outcomes included change from baseline in lesion counts and success (score of 0/1 with ≥2 grade improvement) on investigator global assessment (IGA). Safety was assessed by adverse events and local tolerability. Results: The study enrolled 133 subjects in the T+D group and 69 subjects in the V+P group. The population was balanced, with an approximately even ratio of adolescent (12-17 years) and adult (≥18 years) subjects. The absolute change in lesion counts from baseline were: -69.1 T+D versus -48.1 V+P for total lesions, -29.4 T+D versus -19.5 V+P for inflammatory lesions, and -39.5 T+D versus -28.2 for non-inflammatory lesions ( Conclusion: T+D was demonstrated to be safe and efficacious as a treatment option for patients with severe acne.

Indexed as

Acne vulgariscombination therapydoxycyclinesevere acnetrifarotene

Identifiers

PMID35942016
PMCPMC9345187
OpenAlexW4298870466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.