ArticleInternational journal of imaging systems and technology2022
A comparative analysis of deep neural network architectures for the dynamic diagnosis of COVID-19 based on acoustic cough features.
Article in International journal of imaging systems and technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acoustic sentinel: hierarchical classification of footstep sound using fine and coarse-grain acoustic feature representations for tactical surveillance.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- An AI-Enabled Bias-Free Respiratory Disease Diagnosis Model Using Cough Audio.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Survey on harnessing the Applications of Mobile Computing in Healthcare during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Challenges and Solutions.Computer networks · 2023Review
- A comparative analysis of deep neural network architectures for the dynamic diagnosis of COVID-19 based on acoustic cough features.International journal of imaging systems and technology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study aims to assess the detection performance of a rapid primary screening technique for COVID-19 that is purely based on the cough sound extracted from 2200 clinically validated samples using laboratory molecular testing (1100 COVID-19 negative and 1100 COVID-19 positive). Results and severity of samples based on quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR), cycle threshold, and patient lymphocyte numbers were clinically labeled. Our suggested general methods consist of a tensor based on audio characteristics and deep-artificial neural network classification with deep cough convolutional layers, based on the dilated temporal convolution neural network (DTCN). DTCN has approximately 76% accuracy, 73.12% in TCN, and 72.11% in CNN-LSTM which have been trained at a learning rate of 0.2%, respectively. In our scenario, CNN-LSTM can no longer be employed for COVID-19 predictions, as they would generally offer questionable forecasts. In the previous stage, we discussed the exactness of the total cases of TCN, dilated TCN, and CNN-LSTM models which were truly predicted. Our proposed technique to identify COVID-19 can be considered as a robust and in-demand technique to rapidly detect the infection. We believe it can considerably hinder the COVID-19 pandemic worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.