Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35941919›Full record

ArticlePolitical psychology2022

Moral Identity Predicts Adherence to COVID-19 Mitigation Procedures Depending on Political Ideology: A Comparison Between the USA and New Zealand.

Cillian McHugh, Siobhán M Griffin, Melanie J McGrath, Joshua J Rhee, Paul J Maher, Darragh McCashin, Jenny Roth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Political psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Cillian McHughUniversity of Limerick.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9701-3232
Siobhán M GriffinUniversity of Limerick.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3613-2844
Melanie J McGrathUniversity of Melbourne.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8632-218X
Joshua J RheeUniversity of Melbourne.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6245-7060
Paul J MaherUniversity of Limerick.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0119-0411
Darragh McCashinDublin City University.
Jenny RothUniversity of Limerick.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8047-5740

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reducing the spread of infectious viruses (e.g., COVID-19) can depend on societal compliance with effective mitigations. Identifying factors that influence adherence can inform public policy. In many cases, public health messaging has become highly moralized, focusing on the need to act for the greater good. In such contexts, a person's moral identity may influence behavior and serve to increase compliance through different mechanisms: if a person sees compliance as the right thing to do (internalization) and/or if a person perceives compliance as something others will notice as the right thing to do (symbolization). We argue that in societies that are more politically polarized, people's political ideology may interact with their moral identity to predict compliance. We hypothesized that where polarization is high (e.g., USA), moral identity should positively predict compliance for liberals to a greater extent than for conservatives. However, this effect would not occur where polarization is low (e.g., New Zealand). Moral identity, political ideology, and support for three different COVID-19 mitigation measures were assessed in both nations (

Indexed as

COVID‐19moral iIdentitypolarizationpolitical ideology

Identifiers

PMID35941919
PMCPMC9349772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.