Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35941915›Full record

ArticleArea (Oxford, England)2022

COVID-19, commuter territories and the e-bike boom.

Gordon Waitt, Ian Buchanan, Tess Lea, Glen Fuller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Area (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gordon WaittSchool of Geography and Sustainable Communities, Australian Centre for Cultural Environmental Research University of Wollongong Wollongong New South Wales Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1123-1288
Ian BuchananSchool of Humanities and Social Enquiry University of Wollongong Wollongong New South Wales Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4864-6495
Tess LeaDepartment of Gender and Cultural Studies University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0444-1466
Glen FullerFaculty of Arts and Design University of Canberra Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4185-4654

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The appearance and integration of e-bikes in public space is a source of much debate worldwide. This paper offers insights to these debates by reflecting on how Deleuze and Guattari's concept of assemblage as territory helps us to understand the uptake of e-bike commuter cycling during the Covid-19 pandemic through empirical material from a study conducted in Sydney, Australia. Here we conceptualise commuter journeys in terms of processes of deterritorialisation and reterritorialisation; experienced through the affective territories generated by e-bikes. The disclosure of commuter cycling sensations generated by the pandemic disruptions to commuter routines provided an important lens through which to understand the uptake of e-bikes. The paper concludes by showing the utility of the concept of territory as a means of theorising changes to everyday mobility practices.

Identifiers

PMID35941915
PMCPMC9349559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.