Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35941878›Full record

ArticleJournal of research in science teaching2022

Teaching and learning about respiratory infectious diseases: A scoping review of interventions in K-12 education.

Yasmin B Kafai, Yue Xin, Deborah Fields, Colby Tofel-Grehl

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research in science teaching, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yasmin B KafaiGraduate School of Education University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4018-0491
Yue XinCollege of Education University of Maryland College Park Maryland USA.
Deborah FieldsEmma Eccles Jones College of Education and Human Services Utah State University Logan Utah USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1627-9512
Colby Tofel-GrehlEmma Eccles Jones College of Education and Human Services Utah State University Logan Utah USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4270-4060

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pandemic outbreak of COVID-19 has highlighted an urgent need for infectious disease education for K-12 students. To gather a better understanding of what educational interventions have been conducted and to what effect, we performed a scoping review. We identified and examined 23 empirical researcher- and teacher-designed studies conducted in the last 20 years that have reported on efforts to help K-12 students learn about infectious diseases, with a focus on respiratory transmission. Our review shows studies of educational interventions on this topic are rare, especially with regard to the more population-scale (vs. cellular level) concepts of epidemiology. Furthermore, efforts to educate youth about infectious disease primarily focused on secondary school students, with an emphasis on interactive learning environments to model or simulate both cellular-level and population-level attributes of infectious disease. Studies were only mildly successful in raising science interest, with somewhat stronger findings on helping students engage in scientific inquiry on the biology of infectious diseases and/or community spread. Most importantly, efforts left out critical dimensions of transmission dynamics key to understanding implications for public health. Based on our review, we articulate implications for further research and development in this important domain.

Indexed as

epidemiologygamesinfectious diseaselearning sciencesmodeling toolsscience educationsimulations

Identifiers

PMID35941878
PMCPMC9350247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.