ReviewFrontiers in oncology2022
A Review on Nanocarrier Mediated Treatment and Management of Triple Negative Breast Cancer: A Saudi Arabian Scenario.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Styrene-maleic acid-thymoquinone nanomicelles preparation, and their in vitro and in vivo application in a model of TNBC.Therapeutic delivery · 2025Article
- Two-sample Mendelian Randomization to evaluate the causal relationship between inflammatory arthritis and female-specific cancers.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Targeting triple negative breast cancer stem cells using nanocarriers.Discover nano · 2024Review
- Recent Advances of Multifunctional PLGA Nanocarriers in the Management of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2023Review
- A review of nanomaterials from synthetic and natural molecules for prospective breast cancer nanotherapy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
People have continued to be petrified by the devastating effects of cancer for decades and thus a pursuit for developing anticancer agents have seen an ever-increasing trend in the past few decades. Globally, breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women and the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths. In Saudi Arabia, breast cancer is the most common type of cancer among women, constituting almost 14.2% of the total cancer burden. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer, which is a pathologically diverse disease of higher grade characterized by the absence of the estrogen receptor (ER), the progesterone receptor (PR), and the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expressions. Despite the considerable advancements achieved in the therapeutic management of cancer, TNBC remains an unbeatable challenge, which requires immediate attention as it lacks conventional targets for treatment, leading to a poor clinical prognosis. The present research goals are directed toward the development and implementation of treatment regimens with enhanced bioavailability, targetability, minimized systemic toxicity, and improved outcomes of treatment options. The present treatment and management scenario of TNBC continues to provoke oncologists as well as nanomedical scientists to develop novel and efficient nanotherapies. Lately, scientific endeavors have addressed the importance of enhanced availability and targeted cellular uptake with minimal toxicity, which are achieved by the application of nano drug-carriers. This review intends to summarize the incidence rates of TNBC patients, the importance of nanotherapeutic options for patients suffering from TNBC, the identification of promising molecular targets, and challenges associated with the development of targeted nanotherapeutics with special reference to the Saudi Arabian context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.