ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2022
Validation of an established deep learning auto-segmentation tool for cardiac substructures in 4D radiotherapy planning scans.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative study of electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography (CT) and respiratory four-dimensional CT for radiotherapy in breast cancer patients.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Cardiotoxicity following thoracic radiotherapy for lung cancer.British journal of cancer · 2025Review
- Baseline atrial volume indices and major adverse cardiac events following thoracic radiotherapy.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Cardiac substructure delineation in radiation therapy - A state-of-the-art review.Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology · 2024Review
- The influence of cardiac substructure dose on survival in a large lung cancer stereotactic radiotherapy cohort using a robust personalized contour analysis.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Baseline Cardiac Parameters as Biomarkers of Radiation Cardiotoxicity in Lung Cancer: An NI-HEART Analysis.JACC. CardioOncology · 2024Article
- Autocontouring of primary lung lesions and nodal disease for radiotherapy based only on computed tomography images.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- How to contour the different heart subregions for future deep-learning modeling of the heart: A practical pictorial proposal for radiation oncologists.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Assessment of heart-substructures auto-contouring accuracy for application in heart-sparing radiotherapy for lung cancer.BJR open · 2024Article
- A deep learning segmentation method to assess dose to organs at risk during breast radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2023Article
- Development of a comprehensive cardiac atlas on a 1.5 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Linear Accelerator.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2023Article
- Open-source, fully-automated hybrid cardiac substructure segmentation: development and optimisation.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2023Article
- Association of cardiac calcium burden with overall survival after radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Emerging data suggest that dose-sparing several key cardiac regions is prognostically beneficial in lung cancer radiotherapy. The cardiac substructures are challenging to contour due to their complex geometry, poor soft tissue definition on computed tomography (CT) and cardiorespiratory motion artefact. A neural network was previously trained to generate the cardiac substructures using three-dimensional radiotherapy planning CT scans (3D-CT). In this study, the performance of that tool on the average intensity projection from four-dimensional (4D) CT scans (4D-AVE), now commonly used in lung radiotherapy, was evaluated. Materials and Methods: The 4D-AVE of n=20 patients completing radiotherapy for lung cancer 2015-2020 underwent manual and automated cardiac substructure segmentation. Manual and automated substructures were compared geometrically and dosimetrically. Two senior clinicians also qualitatively assessed the auto-segmentation tool's output. Results: Geometric comparison of the automated and manual segmentations exhibited high levels of similarity across parameters, including volume difference (11.8% overall) and Dice similarity coefficient (0.85 overall), and were consistent with 3D-CT performance. Differences in mean (median 0.2 Gy, range -1.6-0.3 Gy) and maximum (median 0.4 Gy, range -2.2-0.9 Gy) doses to substructures were generally small. Nearly all structures (99.5 %) were deemed to be appropriate for clinical use without further editing. Conclusions: Cardiac substructure auto-segmentation using a deep learning-based tool trained on a 3D-CT dataset was feasible on the 4D-AVE scan, meaning this tool is suitable for use on 4D-CT radiotherapy planning scans. Application of this tool would increase the practicality of routine clinical cardiac substructure delineation, and enable further cardiac radiation effects research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.