Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35941861›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2022

Validation of an established deep learning auto-segmentation tool for cardiac substructures in 4D radiotherapy planning scans.

Gerard M Walls, Valentina Giacometti, Aditya Apte, Maria Thor, Conor McCann, Gerard G Hanna, John O'Connor, Joseph O Deasy, Alan R Hounsell, Karl T Butterworth and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Cardiac substructure delineation in radiation therapy - A state-of-the-art review.Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Gerard M WallsCancer Centre Belfast City Hospital, Belfast Health & Social Care Trust, Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AB, Northern Ireland.
Valentina GiacomettiCancer Centre Belfast City Hospital, Belfast Health & Social Care Trust, Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AB, Northern Ireland.
Aditya ApteDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Maria ThorDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Conor McCannDepartment of Cardiology, Belfast Health & Social Care Trust, Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AB, Northern Ireland.
Gerard G HannaCancer Centre Belfast City Hospital, Belfast Health & Social Care Trust, Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AB, Northern Ireland.
John O'ConnorPatrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AB, Northern Ireland.
Joseph O DeasyDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States.
Alan R HounsellCancer Centre Belfast City Hospital, Belfast Health & Social Care Trust, Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AB, Northern Ireland.
Karl T ButterworthPatrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AB, Northern Ireland.
Aidan J ColeCancer Centre Belfast City Hospital, Belfast Health & Social Care Trust, Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AB, Northern Ireland.
Suneil JainCancer Centre Belfast City Hospital, Belfast Health & Social Care Trust, Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AB, Northern Ireland.
Conor K McGarryPatrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AB, Northern Ireland.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Emerging data suggest that dose-sparing several key cardiac regions is prognostically beneficial in lung cancer radiotherapy. The cardiac substructures are challenging to contour due to their complex geometry, poor soft tissue definition on computed tomography (CT) and cardiorespiratory motion artefact. A neural network was previously trained to generate the cardiac substructures using three-dimensional radiotherapy planning CT scans (3D-CT). In this study, the performance of that tool on the average intensity projection from four-dimensional (4D) CT scans (4D-AVE), now commonly used in lung radiotherapy, was evaluated. Materials and Methods: The 4D-AVE of n=20 patients completing radiotherapy for lung cancer 2015-2020 underwent manual and automated cardiac substructure segmentation. Manual and automated substructures were compared geometrically and dosimetrically. Two senior clinicians also qualitatively assessed the auto-segmentation tool's output. Results: Geometric comparison of the automated and manual segmentations exhibited high levels of similarity across parameters, including volume difference (11.8% overall) and Dice similarity coefficient (0.85 overall), and were consistent with 3D-CT performance. Differences in mean (median 0.2 Gy, range -1.6-0.3 Gy) and maximum (median 0.4 Gy, range -2.2-0.9 Gy) doses to substructures were generally small. Nearly all structures (99.5 %) were deemed to be appropriate for clinical use without further editing. Conclusions: Cardiac substructure auto-segmentation using a deep learning-based tool trained on a 3D-CT dataset was feasible on the 4D-AVE scan, meaning this tool is suitable for use on 4D-CT radiotherapy planning scans. Application of this tool would increase the practicality of routine clinical cardiac substructure delineation, and enable further cardiac radiation effects research.

Indexed as

Auto-segmentationCardiac substructuresCardiotoxicityDeep learningLung cancerRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID35941861
PMCPMC9356270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.