Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35941831›Full record

Trial reportActa ophthalmologica2023

Peripheral refraction, relative peripheral refraction, and axial growth: 18-month data from the randomised study-Clinical study Of Near-sightedness; TReatment with Orthokeratology Lenses (CONTROL study).

Trine M Jakobsen, Anders P Søndergaard, Flemming Møller

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta ophthalmologica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Eight-Year Post-Trial Outcomes of a Two-Year Clinical Trial of DIMS Spectacle Lenses.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Trine M JakobsenDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4496-2610
Anders P SøndergaardDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark.
Flemming MøllerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9678-2171

Funding

Fabrikant Einar Willumsen Foundation 500028Fabrikant Einar Willumsen Foundation 6000073Fight for Sight, Denmark 2017:17Fight for Sight, Denmark 2018:23Fight for Sight, Denmark 2019:21Forskningsrådet at University Hospital of Southern Denmark 2017-04Gangsted Foundation A33352Grosserer Chr Andersen og hustru Foundation 6820 MT/IVHenry og Astrid Møller Foundation 10100343Jørgen Bagenkop Nielsen's Myopia Foundation 2017-0001Laege Frk. K Rasmussen Foundation 2017-09Laege Frk. K Rasmussen Foundation 2018-09Laege Frk. K Rasmussen Foundation 2019-09Overlaege Jørgen Werner Schous og hustru Else-Marie Schou, født Wonge Foundation 1-2018The Danish Eye Research FoundationThe Region of Southern Denmark 17/15133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate changes in peripheral and relative peripheral refraction (RPR) during orthokeratology lens (OKL) use in children, and predictors for myopia progression in a randomized controlled trial.

methodsRefraction and axial length (AL) were measured at baseline, 6, 12, and 18 months for children aged 6-12 years, with myopia of 0.5 to 4.75 dioptres (D) spherical component randomized to either OKL or single-vision spectacles (SVS) at baseline. Cycloplegic spherical equivalent refractive error (SEQ) was measured on-axis and eccentric at 10°, 20°, and 30° during nasal and temporal gaze in the horizontal plane with Shin-Nippon Nvision-K 5001. RPR was computed as SEQ

resultsTwenty-one and 28 subjects from the OKL and SVS groups, respectively were available for analysis. OKL wear induced significant myopic RPR at all eccentricities (p ≤ 0.004) whereas peripheral refraction only changed in two out of six eccentric measuring points. Baseline peripheral refraction SEQ at all eccentricities, baseline on-axis SEQ, and baseline RPR at 30° nasal eccentricity were positively correlated to treatment efficacy defined as change in AL.

conclusionWe found no correlations between change in RPR and treatment efficacy defined as change in AL. Interestingly, our results suggest that the central emmetropisation that occurs during OKL-use accounts for most of the optical changes and to a lesser extent the mid-peripheral plus-zone of the lens.

Indexed as

MyopiaOrthokeratologic ProceduresChildEyeglassesHumansRefraction, OcularTreatment OutcomeMyopiamyopia controlorthokeratologyperipheral refractionrandomizedrelative peripheral refraction

Identifiers

PMID35941831
PMCPMC10087546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.