Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35941686›Full record

ArticleJournal of biological engineering2022

An ensemble-based drug-target interaction prediction approach using multiple feature information with data balancing.

Heba El-Behery, Abdel-Fattah Attia, Nawal El-Fishawy, Hanaa Torkey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biological engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Heba El-BeheryDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr_El_Sheikh, Egypt. eng_heba_2010@eng.kfs.edu.eg.
Abdel-Fattah AttiaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr_El_Sheikh, Egypt.
Nawal El-FishawyComputer Science & Engineering Department, Faculty of Electronic Engineering, Menoufia University, Menouf, Egypt.
Hanaa TorkeyComputer Science & Engineering Department, Faculty of Electronic Engineering, Menoufia University, Menouf, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, drug repositioning has received considerable attention for its advantage to pharmaceutical industries in drug development. Artificial intelligence techniques have greatly enhanced drug reproduction by discovering therapeutic drug profiles, side effects, and new target proteins. However, as the number of drugs increases, their targets and enormous interactions produce imbalanced data that might not be preferable as an input to a prediction model immediately.

methodsThis paper proposes a novel scheme for predicting drug-target interactions (DTIs) based on drug chemical structures and protein sequences. The drug Morgan fingerprint, drug constitutional descriptors, protein amino acid composition, and protein dipeptide composition were employed to extract the drugs and protein's characteristics. Then, the proposed approach for extracting negative samples using a support vector machine one-class classifier was developed to tackle the imbalanced data problem feature sets from the drug-target dataset. Negative and positive samplings were constructed and fed into different prediction algorithms to identify DTIs. A 10-fold CV validation test procedure was applied to assess the predictability of the proposed method, in addition to the study of the effectiveness of the chemical and physical features in the evaluation and discovery of the drug-target interactions.

resultsOur experimental model outperformed existing techniques concerning the curve for receiver operating characteristic (AUC), accuracy, precision, recall F-score, mean square error, and MCC. The results obtained by the AdaBoost classifier enhanced prediction accuracy by 2.74%, precision by 1.98%, AUC by 1.14%, F-score by 3.53%, and MCC by 4.54% over existing methods.

Indexed as

Data balancingDrug–target interactionMachine learningSupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID35941686
PMCPMC9361677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.