ArticleCritical care (London, England)2022
Clinical validation of a multiplex droplet digital PCR for diagnosing suspected bloodstream infections in ICU practice: a promising diagnostic tool.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic performance and antibiotic impact of droplet digital PCR in suspected sepsis: the PROGRESS trial.Nature communications · 2026Trial
- Comparative evaluation of probe-capture and conventional metagenomic sequencing across multiple clinical sample types, with analysis of paired bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and blood samples.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Fast Microbiology: A Pilot Study Comparing Culture-Independent Digital PCR and Blood Culture for Pathogen Detection in Sepsis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Early Breast Cancer: Current and Emerging Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers.Cancers · 2026Review
- Rapid Molecular Diagnostics for Bloodstream Infection in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Development of a Multiplex Droplet Digital PCR Assay for Detection of Tick-Borne Pathogens.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multiplex droplet digital polymerase chain reaction for rapid diagnosing suspected bloodstream infections in patients with hematologic malignancies.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Diagnostic advantage of droplet digital PCR over blood culture in sepsis: a retrospective study of 115 patients.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Application of Droplet Digital PCR in Sputum Samples in Myasthenia Gravis Patients with Pneumonia.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Performance of metagenomic next-generation sequencing for bloodstream infections in perioperative critically ill patients- aFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Molecular insights into antimicrobial resistance in human bacterial pathogens: mechanisms, resistance genes, and translational diagnostic applications.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria: Mechanisms, Pathogen-Specific Strategies.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Review
- Impact of ddPCR panel implementation on optimizing antimicrobial therapy management in critically ill patients with bloodstream infections.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Performance of Droplet Digital PCR for Detecting Pathogens and Resistance Genes in Patients with Suspected Bloodstream Infections.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Incremental diagnostic value of bloodstream pathogen ddPCR for early identification of blood culture-positive bloodstream infection.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Advances in the detection of Drug-Resistant bacteria: current trends and innovations.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Review
- The value of pathogen DNA load in evaluating the efficacy of bloodstream infection: a prospective observational study.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Observational
- DNA-directed electrochemiluminescence nanosphere with electrocatalysis-enhanced microfluidic arrays for rapid multibacterial detection.Science advances · 2025Article
- Duplex ddPCR detection of lytA and piaB in Streptococcus pneumoniae from nasopharyngeal swabs.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Quantification of Bacterial and Drug-Resistant DNA Using dPCR in a Pediatric Patient with CVC-Related Bloodstream Infection.Infectious disease reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDroplet digital PCR (ddPCR) has emerged as a promising tool of pathogen detection in bloodstream infections (BSIs) in critical care medicine. However, different ddPCR platforms have variable sensitivity and specificity for diverse microorganisms at various infection sites. There is still a lack of prospective clinical studies aimed at validating and interpreting the discrepant ddPCR results for diagnosing BSI in intensive care unit (ICU) practice.
methodsA prospective diagnostic study of multiplex ddPCR panels was conducted in a general ICU from May 21, 2021, to December 22, 2021. Paired blood cultures (BCs) and ddPCRs (2.5 h) were obtained synchronously to detect the 12 most common BSI pathogens and three antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes. Firstly, ddPCR performance was compared to definite BSI. Secondly, clinical validation of ddPCR was compared to composite clinical diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated. Thirdly, the positive rate of AMR genes and related analysis was presented.
resultsA total of 438 episodes of suspected BSIs occurring in 150 critical patients were enrolled. BC and ddPCR were positive for targeted bacteria in 40 (9.1%) and 180 (41.1%) cases, respectively. There were 280 concordant and 158 discordant. In comparison with BCs, the sensitivity of ddPCR ranged from 58.8 to 86.7% with an aggregate of 72.5% in different species, with corresponding specificity ranging from 73.5 to 92.2% with an aggregate of 63.1%. Furthermore, the rate of ddPCR+/BC- results was 33.6% (147/438) with 87.1% (128 of 147) cases was associated with probable (n = 108) or possible (n = 20) BSIs. When clinically diagnosed BSI was used as true positive, the final sensitivity and specificity of ddPCR increased to 84.9% and 92.5%, respectively. In addition, 40 bla
conclusionsThe multiplexed ddPCR is a flexible and universal platform, which can be used as an add-on complementary to conventional BC. When combined with clinical infection evidence, ddPCR shows potential advantages for rapidly diagnosing suspected BSIs and AMR genes in ICU practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.