Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35941625›Full record

ArticleGlobalization and health2022

Perceptions and knowledge regarding the COVID-19 pandemic between U.S. and China: a mixed methods study.

Yutang Xiong, Xingran Weng, Bethany Snyder, Lin Ma, Menglong Cong, Erin L Miller, Lauren Jodi Van Scoy, Robert P Lennon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Globalization and health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yutang XiongDepartment of Research Methods and Statistics, Morgridge College of Education, University of Denver, 1999 E Evans Ave, Denver, CO, USA. yutang.xiong@du.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2365-2760
Xingran WengDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, 90 Hope Drive, Hershey, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9585-5727
Bethany SnyderCenter for Community Health Integration, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, 11000 Cedar Ave, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Lin MaDepartment of Research Methods and Statistics, Morgridge College of Education, University of Denver, 1999 E Evans Ave, Denver, CO, USA.
Menglong CongDepartment of Research Methods and Statistics, Morgridge College of Education, University of Denver, 1999 E Evans Ave, Denver, CO, USA.
Erin L MillerDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, 90 Hope Drive, Hershey, PA, USA.
Lauren Jodi Van ScoyDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, 90 Hope Drive, Hershey, PA, USA.
Robert P LennonDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, 90 Hope Drive, Hershey, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSARS-CoV-2, a new coronavirus first reported by China on December 31st, 2019, has led to a global health crisis that continues to challenge governments and public health organizations. Understanding COVID-19 knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) is key for informing messaging strategies to contain the pandemic. Cross-national studies (e.g.: comparing China to the U.S.) are needed to better understand how trans-cultural differences may drive differences in pandemic response and behaviors. The goal of the study is to compare knowledge and perceptions of COVID-19 between adults in China and the U.S. These data will provide insight into challenges these nations may face in coordinating pandemic response.

methodsThis is a convergent mixed methods study comparing responses from China and the U.S. to a multinational COVID-19 KAP online survey. The survey included five quantitative constructs and five open-ended questions. Chinese respondents (n = 56) were matched for gender, age, education, perceived social standing, and time of survey completion with a U.S. cohort (n = 57) drawn from 10,620 U.S. RESPONDENTS: Quantitative responses were compared using T-test & Fisher-Exact tests. Inductive thematic analysis was applied to open-ended questions.

resultsBoth U.S. and Chinese samples had relatively high intention to follow preventive behaviors overall. Differences in intended compliance with a specific recommendation appear to be driven by the different cultural norms in U.S. and China. Both groups expressed trepidation about the speed of COVID-19 vaccine development, driven by concern for safety among Chinese respondents, and concern for efficacy among U.S. RESPONDENTS: The Chinese cohort expressed worries about other countries' passive handling of the pandemic while the U.S. cohort focused on domestic responses from individuals and government. U.S. participants appeared more knowledgeable on some aspects of COVID-19. Different perspectives regarding COVID-19 origins were identified among the two groups. Participants from both samples reported high trust in health professionals and international health organizations.

conclusionsMixed methods data from this cross-national analysis suggests sociocultural differences likely influence perceptions and knowledge of COVID-19 and its related public health policies. Discovering and addressing these culturally-based differences and perceptions are essential to coordinate a global pandemic response.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultChinaCOVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19Mixed methodsPublic messagingSociocultural differencesU.S. and China

Identifiers

PMID35941625
PMCPMC9358088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.