The cost of divided attention for detection of simple visual features primarily reflects limits in post-perceptual processing.

Covert spatial attention allows us to prioritize processing at relevant locations. Perception is generally poorer when attention is distributed across multiple locations than when attention is focused on a single location. However, while divided attention typically impairs performance, recent work suggests that divided attention does not seem to impair detection of simple visual features. Here, we re-examined this possibility. In two experiments, observers detected a simple target (a vertical Gabor), and we manipulated whether attention was focused at one location (focal-cue condition) or distributed across two locations (distributed-cue condition). In Experiment 1, targets could appear independently at each location, such that observers needed to judge target presence for each location separately in the distributed-cue condition. Under these conditions, we found a robust cost of dividing attention. Next, we further probed what stage of processing gave rise to this cost. In Experiment 1, the cost of dividing attention could reflect a limit in the ability to make concurrent judgments about target presence. In Experiment 2, we simplified the task to test whether this was the case: just one target could appear on each trial, such that observers made a single judgment ("was a target present?") in both the focal-cue and distributed-cue conditions. Here, we found a marginal cost of dividing attention that was weaker than the cost in Experiment 1. Together, our results suggest that divided attention does impair detection of simple visual features, but that this cost is primarily due to a limit in post-perceptual processes.