Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35941371›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2022

Geographic isolation drives speciation in Nearctic aphids.

Nate B Hardy, Chloe Kaczvinsky, Gwendolyn Bird, Robin Richter, Jeremy R Dettman, Eric Maw, Bryan M T Brunet, Robert G Foottit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nate B HardyDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA. n8@auburn.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6133-7086
Chloe KaczvinskyDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2802-2976
Gwendolyn BirdDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.
Robin RichterOttawa Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Jeremy R DettmanOttawa Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Eric MawOttawa Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Bryan M T BrunetOttawa Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5083-9662
Robert G FoottitOttawa Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Across herbivorous insect clades, species richness and host-use diversity tend to positively covary. This could be because host-use divergence drives speciation, or because it raises the ecological limits on species richness. To evaluate these hypotheses, we performed phylogenetic path model analyses of the species diversity of Nearctic aphids. Here, we show that variation in the species richness of aphid clades is caused mainly by host-use divergence, whereas variation in speciation rates is caused more by divergence in non-host-related niche variables. Aphid speciation is affected by both the evolution of host and non-host-related niche components, but the former is largely caused by the latter. Thus, our analyses suggest that host-use divergence can both raise the ecological limits on species richness and drive speciation, although in the latter case, host-use divergence tends to be a step along the causal path leading from non-host-related niche evolution to speciation.

Indexed as

AphidsAnimalsHerbivoryInsectaPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID35941371
PMCPMC9360434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.