ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022
Multicentric exploration of tool annotation in robotic surgery: lessons learned when starting a surgical artificial intelligence project.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Application of artificial intelligence in esophageal surgery: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Untangling surgical gesture analysis-are we even speaking the same language? a systematic review.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluating Injection Laryngoplasty Skills Using a Foundation Model: A Feasibility Study.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in robotic urologic surgery: a scoping review.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- ROBUST-MIPS: A Combined Skeletal Pose and Instance Segmentation Dataset for Laparoscopic Surgical Instruments.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Bibliometric analysis of deep learning for surgical instrument segmentation, detection and tracking in minimally invasive surgery.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for intraoperative video analysis in robotic-assisted esophagectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence integration in surgery through hand and instrument tracking: a systematic literature review.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
- Automated performance metrics and surgical gestures: two methods for assessment of technical skills in robotic surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- Article
- A new mixed reality tool for training in minimally invasive robotic-assisted surgery.Health information science and systems · 2023Article
- Development of Bleeding Artificial Intelligence Detector (BLAIR) System for Robotic Radical Prostatectomy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Surgical Phase Duration in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: A Surgical Data Science Exploration for Clinical Relevance.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Active learning for extracting surgomic features in robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a prospective annotation study.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Surgical Training for Kidney Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Re: Walter Artibani, Giovanni Cacciamani. Is the Choice Between Clips and No Clips or Cautery and No Cautery Still a Dilemma in Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy? Eur Urol Open Sci 2022;44:76-7.European urology open science · 2022Article
- Automatic Annotations by Augmented Reality-Enabled Laparoscopic Surgery.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
- First-in-human real-time AI-assisted instrument deocclusion during augmented reality robotic surgery.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
- Exploring the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Global Health and Enhancing Healthcare in Developing Nations.Journal of primary care & community healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) holds tremendous potential to reduce surgical risks and improve surgical assessment. Machine learning, a subfield of AI, can be used to analyze surgical video and imaging data. Manual annotations provide veracity about the desired target features. Yet, methodological annotation explorations are limited to date. Here, we provide an exploratory analysis of the requirements and methods of instrument annotation in a multi-institutional team from two specialized AI centers and compile our lessons learned.
methodsWe developed a bottom-up approach for team annotation of robotic instruments in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), which was subsequently validated in robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE). Furthermore, instrument annotation methods were evaluated for their use in Machine Learning algorithms. Overall, we evaluated the efficiency and transferability of the proposed team approach and quantified performance metrics (e.g., time per frame required for each annotation modality) between RAPN and RAMIE.
resultsWe found a 0.05 Hz image sampling frequency to be adequate for instrument annotation. The bottom-up approach in annotation training and management resulted in accurate annotations and demonstrated efficiency in annotating large datasets. The proposed annotation methodology was transferrable between both RAPN and RAMIE. The average annotation time for RAPN pixel annotation ranged from 4.49 to 12.6 min per image; for vector annotation, we denote 2.92 min per image. Similar annotation times were found for RAMIE. Lastly, we elaborate on common pitfalls encountered throughout the annotation process.
conclusionsWe propose a successful bottom-up approach for annotator team composition, applicable to any surgical annotation project. Our results set the foundation to start AI projects for instrument detection, segmentation, and pose estimation. Due to the immense annotation burden resulting from spatial instrumental annotation, further analysis into sampling frequency and annotation detail needs to be conducted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35941310What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.