Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35941287›Full record

ReviewArchivum immunologiae et therapiae experimentalis2022

Immunotherapy in Ovarian Cancer.

Natalia Siminiak, Rafał Czepczyński, Mikołaj Piotr Zaborowski, Dariusz Iżycki

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archivum immunologiae et therapiae experimentalis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Induction of Apoptosis by Ethanol, Methanol, and Ethyl Acetate Extracts fromInternational journal of fertility & sterility · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natalia SiminiakDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland. nsiminiak@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5585-3110
Rafał CzepczyńskiDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Mikołaj Piotr ZaborowskiDepartment of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Gynecologic Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Dariusz IżyckiDepartment of Cancer Immunology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Poznan University of Medical Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite advances in surgery and chemotherapy, ovarian cancer remains one of the most lethal malignancies. Hence, the implementation of novel treatment approaches is required to improve the outcomes of the disease. Immunotherapy has been proven to be effective in many tumors and has already been incorporated into clinical practice. In this review, we describe key strategies in immunotherapy of ovarian cancer and summarize data from clinical studies assessing immunological prospects which could improve ovarian cancer treatment approaches in the future. The most notable current strategies include checkpoint blockade agents, the use of vaccines, adoptive cell transfer, as well as various combinations of these methods. While several of these options are promising, large controlled randomized studies are still needed to implement new immunotherapeutic options into clinical practice.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesOvarian NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImmunotherapyImmunotherapy, AdoptiveCancer VaccinesAdoptive transferImmunotherapyOvarian cancerVaccine

Identifiers

PMID35941287
PMCPMC9360103
OpenAlexW4290737584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.