Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35941279›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A comparison of various methods for measuring breast density and breast tissue composition in adolescent girls and women.

Rebecca D Kehm, E Jane Walter, Ana Pereira, Melissa L White, Sabine Oskar, Karin B Michels, John A Shepherd, Lothar Lilge, Mary Beth Terry

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Socioeconomic Status at Birth and Breast Tissue Composition in Adolescence and Adulthood.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Rebecca D KehmDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY, 10032, USA. rk2967@cumc.columbia.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6089-6799
E Jane WalterPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 101 College St, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ana PereiraInstitute of Nutrition and Food Technology, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Melissa L WhiteDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Sabine OskarDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Karin B MichelsDepartment of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, 650 Charles E Young Dr S, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
John A ShepherdPopulation Sciences in the Pacific Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, 701 Ilalo St, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA.
Lothar LilgePrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 101 College St, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Mary Beth TerryDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, 722 W 168th St, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Columbia University · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of Chile · CLUniversity of Freiburg · DEUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · US

Funding

Pregnancy and Prenatal PAHs and other Environmental Exposures and Breast CancerU01ES026122 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MILLER, RACHEL L, TERRY, MARY BETH · 2015 to 2019
$4.5M
Characterizing the role of adolescent physical activity in early onset breast cancer risk for women across the familial risk continuumK99CA263024 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KEHM, REBECCA D · 2022 to 2023
$342k
NCI NIH HHS K99 CA263024NIEHS NIH HHS U01ES026122, U01ES026127, U01ES026130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compared different approaches to measuring breast density and breast tissue composition (BTC) in adolescent girls (n = 42, aged 14-16 years) and their mothers (n = 39, aged 36-61 years) from a cohort in Santiago, Chile. Optical spectroscopy (OS) was used to measure collagen, water, and lipid concentrations, which were combined into a percent breast density index (%BDI). A clinical dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) system calibrated to measure breast density provided percent fibroglandular volume (%FGV) from manually delineated images. After digitizing mammogram films, the percent mammographic breast density (%MBD) was measured using computer-assisted software. Partial correlation coefficients (r

Indexed as

Breast DensityBreast NeoplasmsAbsorptiometry, PhotonAdolescentBreastFemaleHumansMammography

Identifiers

PMID35941279
PMCPMC9360013
OpenAlexW4290723186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.