Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35941278›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of older people nursing2023

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mobility of older adults: A scoping review.

Sarah Giulia Bandeira Felipe, Patrícia Parreira Batista, Cristina Cristóvão Ribeiro da Silva, Ruth Caldeira de Melo, Daniela de Assumpção, Monica Rodrigues Perracini

Open access · greenAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of older people nursing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mobility of older adults: A scoping review.International journal of older people nursing · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah Giulia Bandeira FelipeUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5997-190X
Patrícia Parreira BatistaUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Cristina Cristóvão Ribeiro da SilvaCentro de Ensino Superior de Foz do Iguaçu (CESUFOZ), Foz do Iguaçu, Paraná, Brazil.
Ruth Caldeira de MeloUniversidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Daniela de AssumpçãoUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Monica Rodrigues PerraciniUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRHospital Universitário da Universidade de São Paulo · BRUnião Dinâmica de Faculdades Cataratas · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

objectivesTo identify the most frequent determinants of contact limitation on older adults' mobility addressed by the recommendations to mitigate mobility limitation during the COVID-19 pandemic and identify the recommendations characteristics and means of dissemination that might guide coping actions.

backgroundMeasures for physical contact restriction were implemented to prevent COVID-19 spread. These measures directly impacted older people, reducing their mobility, especially outside home environment. Health systems worldwide need to be prepared to implement strategies to mitigate negative effects of reduced mobility in this population.

designScoping review using Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework.

methodTherefore, a scoping review was conducted in LILACS, CINAHL, MEDLINE, WEB OF SCIENCE and SCOPUS databases. Documents and reports with recommendations from government agencies were also consulted. Results were presented in a narrative synthesis based on a conceptual model of mobility proposed by Webber (The Gerontologist, 2010, 50, 443) regarding the most frequently addressed determinants, characteristics of the proposed interventions, and means of dissemination for the older person population.

findingsTwenty-eight studies were selected for the final sample. According to Webber's model, most articles (n = 14) presented the impacts on mobility from the perspective of physical determinants, relating this aspect to biological losses in the musculoskeletal system, and a minority assessed mobility in vital spaces, encompassing environmental (n = 3) and financial (n = 1) determinants. Also, the most frequent recommendation was that physical activity promotes maintenance of mobility and prevents the occurrence of adverse results, such as falls, fractures and functional decline. As to dissemination, digital technologies were recognised as a strategy to motivate, instruct and monitor exercise practice to increase mobility in older adults.

conclusionThe main conditions related to the decline in mobility of older adults during COVID-19 pandemic were physical inactivity and sedentary lifestyle. The practice of physical activity is widespread and needs to be adapted according to individual needs. Finally, digital technologies are essential tools in this period, but other alternatives should also be considered for low-income seniors. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: It is hoped that the gaps identified through this scoping review can help enhance the discussion on the broader assessment of mobility in older adults and the design of interventions when contact restriction is a reality.

Indexed as

COVID-19AgedExerciseHumansPandemicsageingCOVID-19locomotionmobilityolder adultsphysical contact restrictionsocial isolation

Identifiers

PMID35941278
PMCPMC9538411
OpenAlexW4290726882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.