Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35941183›Full record

SynthesisEye (London, England)2023

Predictors of emotional distress in uveal melanoma survivors: a systematic review.

Cari Davies, Stephen Lloyd Brown, Peter Fisher, Laura Hope-Stone, Debra Fisher, Andrew Morgan, Mary Gemma Cherry

Open access · hybridFull text readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Eye (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cari DaviesPrimary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6852-5511
Stephen Lloyd BrownSchool of Psychology, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Peter FisherPrimary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. plfisher@liverpool.ac.uk.
Laura Hope-StonePrimary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Debra FisherPrimary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Andrew MorganPrimary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Mary Gemma CherryPrimary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
University of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Plymouth · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uveal melanoma (UM) survivors can experience significant emotional distress, although the factors underpinning this are poorly understood. Systematic reviews of distress in UM only include cross-sectional studies, thereby limiting our understanding of causal factors. This review identified prospective clinical, demographic, social and psychological predictors of distress in UM survivors. A systematic search of the literature for English language prospective studies was conducted. Thirteen papers, reporting data from seven unique datasets were included in a narrative synthesis of the results. Younger age (3 studies from 3 datasets), physical health (including visual impairment, ocular symptoms, and other UM-related factors; 3 studies from 3 datasets), and psychological factors (mainly baseline distress; 3 studies from 3 datasets and worry about recurrence; 2 studies from 2 datasets), significantly predicted distress. There was no consistent evidence for other demographic, clinical or social variables (significant in <50% of datasets). Generally, the quality of the papers was adequate. However, attrition rates were high or not reported in over half of the included studies. The findings of this review emphasise the importance of attempts to prevent and recognise distress immediately post-diagnosis of UM. Particular focus should be given to younger patients, those with physical and psychological health difficulties at the time of diagnosis, and those who develop adverse treatment symptoms during survivorship. More research into potential social and psychological variables and their role in predicting distress in survivors is recommended.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsPsychological DistressCross-Sectional StudiesHumansProspective StudiesQuality of LifeStress, PsychologicalUveal Melanoma

Identifiers

PMID35941183
PMCPMC10049992
OpenAlexW4290659503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read50
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.