Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35940877›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2022

A Distributed Network for Multimodal Experiential Representation of Concepts.

Jiaqing Tong, Jeffrey R Binder, Colin Humphries, Stephen Mazurchuk, Lisa L Conant, Leonardo Fernandino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A Common Representational Code for Event and Object Concepts in the Brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Neural Representations of Concreteness and Concrete Concepts Are Specific to the Individual.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Brain-wide representation of social knowledge.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  15. The neural representation of body part concepts.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Decomposing unaccusativity: a statistical modelling approach.Language, cognition and neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiaqing TongDepartments of Neurology.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2587-0251
Jeffrey R BinderDepartments of Neurology.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2233-5640
Colin HumphriesDepartments of Neurology.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5131-8743
Stephen MazurchukDepartments of Neurology.
Lisa L ConantDepartments of Neurology.
Leonardo FernandinoDepartments of Neurology lfernandino@mcw.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4571-0500

Funding

Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM080202 · NIGMS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI BARBIERI, JOSEPH T, SALZMAN, NITA H · 2010 to 2024
$5.7M
Concept Representation in the Human BrainR01DC016622 · NIDCD · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI BINDER, JEFFREY R · 2018 to 2022
$3.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016622NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM080202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroimaging, neuropsychological, and psychophysical evidence indicate that concept retrieval selectively engages specific sensory and motor brain systems involved in the acquisition of the retrieved concept. However, it remains unclear which supramodal cortical regions contribute to this process and what kind of information they represent. Here, we used representational similarity analysis of two large fMRI datasets with a searchlight approach to generate a detailed map of human brain regions where the semantic similarity structure across individual lexical concepts can be reliably detected. We hypothesized that heteromodal cortical areas typically associated with the default mode network encode multimodal experiential information about concepts, consistent with their proposed role as cortical integration hubs. In two studies involving different sets of concepts and different participants (both sexes), we found a distributed, bihemispheric network engaged in concept representation, composed of high-level association areas in the anterior, lateral, and ventral temporal lobe; inferior parietal lobule; posterior cingulate gyrus and precuneus; and medial, dorsal, ventrolateral, and orbital prefrontal cortex. In both studies, a multimodal model combining sensory, motor, affective, and other types of experiential information explained significant variance in the neural similarity structure observed in these regions that was not explained by unimodal experiential models or by distributional semantics (i.e., word2vec similarity). These results indicate that during concept retrieval, lexical concepts are represented across a vast expanse of high-level cortical regions, especially in the areas that make up the default mode network, and that these regions encode multimodal experiential information.

Indexed as

Brain MappingSemanticsComprehensionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleParietal Lobeconcept representationdefault mode networkfMRIlanguagerepresentational similarity analysissemantics

Identifiers

PMID35940877
PMCPMC9480893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.