Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35940872›Full record

Trial reportArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition2023

Outcome at 4.5 years after dextrose gel treatment of hypoglycaemia: follow-up of the Sugar Babies randomised trial.

Deborah L Harris, Greg D Gamble, Jane E Harding, CHYLD Study Group

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Oral dextrose gel for hypoglycemia in a well-baby nursery: a baby-friendly initiative.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Article
  4. Neonatal hypoglycaemia.BMJ medicine · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Deborah L HarrisSchool of Nursing Midwifery and Health Practice, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2498-9223
Greg D GambleLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jane E HardingLiggins Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand j.harding@auckland.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2697-1422
CHYLD Study Group
University of Auckland · NZ

Funding

Children with Hypoglycemia and their Later Development (the CHYLD Study)R01HD069622 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND · PI HARDING, JANE · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD069622
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDextrose gel is used to treat neonatal hypoglycaemia, but later effects are unknown. DESIGN AND

settingFollow-up of participants in a randomised trial recruited in a tertiary centre and assessed in a research clinic. PATIENTS: Children who were hypoglycaemic (<2.6 mmol/L) recruited to the Sugar Babies Study (

interventionsAssessment of neurological status, cognitive ability (Weschler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence), executive function (five tasks), motor function (Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (MABC-2)), vision, visual processing (Beery-Buktenica Development Test of Visual Motor Integration (Beery VMI) and motion coherence thresholds) and growth at 2 years.

main outcome measuresNeurosensory impairment (cerebral palsy; visual impairment; deafness; intelligence quotient <85; Beery VMI <85; MABC-2 score <15th centile; low performance on executive function or motion coherence).

resultsOf 237 babies randomised, 185 (78%) were assessed; 96 randomised to dextrose and 89 to placebo gel. Neurosensory impairment was similar in both groups (dextrose 36/96 (38%) vs placebo 34/87 (39%), relative risk 0.96, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.34, p=0.83). Secondary outcomes were also similar, except children randomised to dextrose had worse visual processing scores (mean (SD) 94.5 (15.9) vs 99.8 (15.9), p=0.02) but no differences in the proportion with visual processing scores <85 or other visual test scores. Children randomised to dextrose gel were taller (z-scores 0.18 (0.97) vs -0.17 (1.01), p=0.001) and heavier (0.57 (1.07) vs 0.29 (0.92), p=0.01).

conclusionsTreatment of neonatal hypoglycaemia (<2.6 mol/L) with dextrose gel does not alter neurosensory impairment at 4.5 years. However, further assessment of visual processing and growth may be warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN1260800062392.

Indexed as

HypoglycemiaInfant, Newborn, DiseasesBlood GlucoseChildChild, PreschoolFollow-Up StudiesGlucoseHumansInfantInfant, NewbornSugarsBlood GlucoseGlucoseSugarsendocrinologyneonatologyneurodevelopment

Identifiers

PMID35940872
PMCPMC9905356
OpenAlexW4290721543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.