Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35940831›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Use of a penicillin allergy clinical decision rule to enable direct oral penicillin provocation: an international multicentre randomised control trial in an adult population (PALACE): study protocol.

Ana-Maria Copaescu, Fiona James, Sara Vogrin, Morgan Rose, Kyra Chua, Natasha E Holmes, Nicholas A Turner, Cosby Stone, Elizabeth Phillips, Jason Trubiano

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04454229 (The Use of Penicillin Allergy Clinical Decision Rule to Enable Direct Oral Penicillin Challenge - An International Multicenter Randomized Control Trial - The PALACE Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04454229 nacompletednot on this map

The Use of Penicillin Allergy Clinical Decision Rule to Enable Direct Oral Penicillin Challenge - An International Multicenter Randomized Control Trial - The PALACE Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAustin HealthRan2021 to 2022Enrolled382ConditionsHypersensitivity, Immediate, Hypersensitivity, Delayed, Hypersensitivity ResponseArmsDirect oral penicillin challenge, Standard of care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Institutional Trends in Penicillin Allergy: A New Era of Active Penicillin Allergy Delabeling.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Penicillin allergy-Truth or duty?]Die Anaesthesiologie · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Tools for Etiologic Diagnosis of Drug-Induced Allergic Conditions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Ana-Maria CopaescuCentre for Antibiotic Allergy and Research, Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia ana.copaescu@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9183-5032
Fiona JamesCentre for Antibiotic Allergy and Research, Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0469-5666
Sara VogrinDepartment of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.
Morgan RoseCentre for Antibiotic Allergy and Research, Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Kyra ChuaCentre for Antibiotic Allergy and Research, Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Natasha E HolmesCentre for Antibiotic Allergy and Research, Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Nicholas A TurnerDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, Carolina, USA.
Cosby StoneDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Elizabeth PhillipsDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Jason TrubianoCentre for Antibiotic Allergy and Research, Department of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5111-6367
The University of Melbourne · AUAntibiotic Research UK · GBDuke Medical Center · USMcGill University Health Centre · CAMurdoch University · AUVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPenicillin allergies are highly prevalent in the healthcare setting and associated with the prescription of second-line inferior antibiotics. More than 85% of all penicillin allergy labels can be removed by skin testing and 96%-99% of low-risk penicillin allergy labels can be removed by direct oral challenge. An internally and externally validated clinical assessment tool for penicillin allergy, PEN-FAST, can identify a low-risk penicillin allergy without the need for skin testing; a score of less than 3 has a negative predictive value of 96.3% (95% CI, 94.1 to 97.8) for the presence of a penicillin allergy. It is hypothesised that PEN-FAST is a safe and effective tool for assessing penicillin allergy in an outpatient clinic setting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is an international, multicentre randomised control trial using the PEN-FAST tool to risk-stratify penicillin allergy labels in adult outpatients. The study's primary objective is to evaluate the non-inferiority of using PEN-FAST score-guided management with direct oral challenge compared with standard care (defined as prick and intradermal skin testing followed by oral penicillin challenge). Participants will be randomised 1:1 to the intervention arm (direct oral penicillin challenge) or standard of care arm (skin testing followed by oral penicillin challenge, if skin testing is negative). The sample size of 380 randomised patients (190 per treatment arm) is required to demonstrate non-inferiority. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study will be performed according to the guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration and is approved by the Austin Health Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/62425/Austin-2020) in Melbourne Australia, Vanderbilt University Institutional Review Board (IRB #202174) in Tennessee, USA, Duke University Institutional Review Board (IRB #Pro00108461) in North Carolina, USA and McGill University Health Centre Research Ethics Board in Canada (PALACE/2022-7605). The results of this study will be published and presented in various scientific forums. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04454229.

Indexed as

Drug HypersensitivityPenicillinsAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsClinical Decision RulesEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSkin TestsAnti-Bacterial AgentsPenicillinsIMMUNOLOGYINFECTIOUS DISEASESProtocols & guidelinesPublic health

Identifiers

PMID35940831
PMCPMC9364402
OpenAlexW4290674393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.