ArticleBMJ open2022
Use of a penicillin allergy clinical decision rule to enable direct oral penicillin provocation: an international multicentre randomised control trial in an adult population (PALACE): study protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04454229 (The Use of Penicillin Allergy Clinical Decision Rule to Enable Direct Oral Penicillin Challenge - An International Multicenter Randomized Control Trial - The PALACE Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Use of Penicillin Allergy Clinical Decision Rule to Enable Direct Oral Penicillin Challenge - An International Multicenter Randomized Control Trial - The PALACE Study
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Pragmatic Removal of Penicillin Allergy Electronic Health Record Labels (PROPEL) Trial: A Randomized Clinical Trial.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2025Trial
- Risk of Self-Reported Penicillin Allergy Despite Removal of Penicillin Allergy Label: Secondary Analysis of the PALACE Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- New Insights Into Immunomodulatory Strategies for Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions: An EAACI Task Force Report.Clinical and translational allergy · 2026Review
- Institutional Trends in Penicillin Allergy: A New Era of Active Penicillin Allergy Delabeling.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2026Article
- Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Special Statement: Assessment and management of reported penicillin allergy in pregnancy.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Feasibility and impact of pharmacist-led penicillin allergy delabelling using the PEN-FAST scoring tool in a Canadian tertiary care hospital.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026Article
- Direct Single-Dose Drug-Provocation Test Is Safe for Delabelling Penicillin Low-Risk Reactions in Adults.Allergy · 2025Article
- [Penicillin allergy-Truth or duty?]Die Anaesthesiologie · 2024Review
- Management of BAME patients with a history of penicillin allergy: barriers to best practice and strategies to overcome these.Infection prevention in practice · 2023Article
- Tools for Etiologic Diagnosis of Drug-Induced Allergic Conditions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Delabelling multiple antibiotic allergy: Practical issues.Frontiers in allergy · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPenicillin allergies are highly prevalent in the healthcare setting and associated with the prescription of second-line inferior antibiotics. More than 85% of all penicillin allergy labels can be removed by skin testing and 96%-99% of low-risk penicillin allergy labels can be removed by direct oral challenge. An internally and externally validated clinical assessment tool for penicillin allergy, PEN-FAST, can identify a low-risk penicillin allergy without the need for skin testing; a score of less than 3 has a negative predictive value of 96.3% (95% CI, 94.1 to 97.8) for the presence of a penicillin allergy. It is hypothesised that PEN-FAST is a safe and effective tool for assessing penicillin allergy in an outpatient clinic setting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is an international, multicentre randomised control trial using the PEN-FAST tool to risk-stratify penicillin allergy labels in adult outpatients. The study's primary objective is to evaluate the non-inferiority of using PEN-FAST score-guided management with direct oral challenge compared with standard care (defined as prick and intradermal skin testing followed by oral penicillin challenge). Participants will be randomised 1:1 to the intervention arm (direct oral penicillin challenge) or standard of care arm (skin testing followed by oral penicillin challenge, if skin testing is negative). The sample size of 380 randomised patients (190 per treatment arm) is required to demonstrate non-inferiority. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study will be performed according to the guidelines of the Helsinki Declaration and is approved by the Austin Health Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/62425/Austin-2020) in Melbourne Australia, Vanderbilt University Institutional Review Board (IRB #202174) in Tennessee, USA, Duke University Institutional Review Board (IRB #Pro00108461) in North Carolina, USA and McGill University Health Centre Research Ethics Board in Canada (PALACE/2022-7605). The results of this study will be published and presented in various scientific forums. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04454229.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.