Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35940682›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Directors Association2022

Detecting Cognitive Impairment and Dementia in the Emergency Department: A Scoping Review.

Armin Nowroozpoor, Jeff Dussetschleger, William Perry, Mary Sano, Amy Aloysi, Michael Belleville, Alexandria Brackett, Jon Mark Hirshon, William Hung, Joan Michelle Moccia and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A Systematic Review Evaluating Pain Assessment Strategies for Patients With Dementia in the Emergency Department: The Geriatric ED Guidelines 2.0.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. A systematic review of interventions for persons living with dementia: The Geriatric ED Guidelines 2.0.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Emergency Department Visit Outcomes of a Multicenter Randomized Trial of a Fall Prevention Intervention.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Dementia Screening in the Emergency Department: A Communication-Centered Process.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Recruiting People With Dementia in Emergency Research: Insights From Geriatric Emergency Care Applied Research 2.0 Network (GEAR 2.0) Pilot Studies.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  11. Beyond Triage: Cognitive Profiles and ED-To-Inpatient Costs and Resource Pathways in Older Adults.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. U.S. Emergency Department Visits by Persons With Dementia: Impact of Medicare Claims Data and Undiagnosed Dementia.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  14. The Geriatric Emergency Care Applied Research Standardization Study (GEARSS): An Observational Study of Older Emergency Department Patients.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Detection of emergency department patients at risk of dementia through artificial intelligence.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Observational
  20. Emergency Care for Persons Living with Dementia.Emergency medicine clinics of North America · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Armin NowroozpoorDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Jeff DussetschlegerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
William PerryDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Mary SanoDepartment of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Research and Development, James J. Peters VAMC, Bronx, NY, USA.
Amy AloysiDepartment of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Michael BellevilleDementia Action Alliance, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Alexandria BrackettHarvey Cushing/John Hay Whitney Medical Library, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Jon Mark HirshonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
William HungBrookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Joan Michelle MocciaSenior ER, St Mary Mercy Hospital, Livonia, MI, USA.
Ugochi OhuabunwaDivision of General Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Manish N ShahBerbee Walsh Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA; Department of Medicine (Geriatrics and Gerontology), University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA; Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Ula HwangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA. Electronic address: ula.hwang@yale.edu.
GEAR 2.0-ADC Network
Yale University · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USDuke University · USEmory University · USGeriatric Research Education and Clinical Center · USJames J. Peters VA Medical Center · USMercy Medical Center · USUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

Geriatrics Emergency care Applied Research Network 2.1 - AdvanCing and Expanding Dementia care (GEAR 2.1 - ACED)R33AG069822 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Ula Y Hwang, MANISH N SHAH · 2023 to 2026
$5.3M
Geriatric Emergency care Applied Research network 2.0 - Advancing Dementia Care (GEAR 2.0 ADC)R61AG069822 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI HWANG, ULA Y, SHAH, MANISH N · 2020 to 2021
$3.0M
GAPcare II: The Geriatric Acute & Post-acute Care Coordination Program for Fall Prevention in the Emergency DepartmentK76AG059983 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI GOLDBERG, ELIZABETH · 2019 to 2024
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS K76 AG059983NIA NIH HHS R33 AG069822NIA NIH HHS R61 AG069822
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify research and practice gaps to establish future research priorities to advance the detection of cognitive impairment and dementia in the emergency department (ED).

designLiterature review and consensus-based rankings by a transdisciplinary, stakeholder task force of experts, persons living with dementia, and care partners. SETTING AND

participantsScoping reviews focused on adult ED patients.

methodsTwo systematic scoping reviews of 7 medical research databases focusing on best tools and approaches for detecting cognitive impairment and dementia in the ED in terms of (1) most accurate and (2) most pragmatic to implement. The results were screened, reviewed, and abstracted for relevant information and presented at the stakeholder consensus conference for discussion and ranked prioritization.

resultsWe identified a total of 1464 publications and included 45 to review for accurate tools and approaches for detecting cognitive impairment and dementia. Twenty-seven different assessments and instruments have been studied in the ED setting to evaluate cognitive impairment and dementia, with many focusing on sensitivity and specificity of instruments to screen for cognitive impairment. For pragmatic tools, we identified a total of 2166 publications and included 66 in the review. Most extensively studied tools included the Ottawa 3DY and Six-Item Screener (SIS). The SIS was the shortest to administer (1 minute). Instruments with the highest negative predictive value were the SIS (vs MMSE) and the 4 A's Test (vs expert diagnosis). The GEAR 2.0 Advancing Dementia Care Consensus conference ranked research priorities that included the need for more approaches to recognize more effectively and efficiently persons who may be at risk for cognitive impairment and dementia, while balancing the importance of equitable screening, purpose, and consequences of differentiating various forms of cognitive impairment. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The scoping review and consensus process identified gaps in clinical care that should be prioritized for research efforts to detect cognitive impairment and dementia in the ED setting. These gaps will be addressed as future GEAR 2.0 research funding priorities.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionDementiaAdultEmergency Service, HospitalHumansMass ScreeningSensitivity and Specificitycognitive impairmentDementiaemergency department

Identifiers

PMID35940682
PMCPMC10804640
OpenAlexW4289877090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.