Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35940632›Full record

ArticleCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2023

Exploiting the advantages of a wireless seed localization system that differentiates between the seeds: Breast cancer resection following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Elizabeth Shaughnessy, Charmi Vijapura, Chantal Reyna, Jaime Lewis, Kyle Lewis, Su-Ju Lee, Lawrence Sobel, Rifat Wahab, Lauren Rosen, Ann Brown

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth ShaughnessyDepartment of Surgery, Section of Breast Surgery within Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0216-3965
Charmi VijapuraDepartment of Radiology, Division of Breast Imaging, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2563-0378
Chantal ReynaDepartment of Surgery, Crozer Health System, Springfield, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7117-3716
Jaime LewisDepartment of Surgery, Section of Breast Surgery within Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6682-5537
Kyle LewisDepartment of Radiology, Division of Breast Imaging, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0942-039X
Su-Ju LeeDepartment of Radiology, Division of Breast Imaging, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1070-707X
Lawrence SobelDepartment of Radiology, Division of Breast Imaging, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3842-0599
Rifat WahabDepartment of Radiology, Division of Breast Imaging, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9177-6098
Lauren RosenDepartment of Pathology, Section of Surgical Pathology within Division of Anatomic Pathology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Ann BrownDepartment of Radiology, Division of Breast Imaging, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2856-863X
University of Cincinnati · USCrozer-Keystone Health System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost wireless localization methods utilize only one means of detection for the surgeon, sufficient to localize a single small breast lesion for excision. Complex cases requiring bracketing of a larger lesion or localization of two or more close lesions can superimpose the signal from separate "seeds" with such methods. The lack of discernment between the localization "seeds" can disorient the surgeon, risking a missed lesion on excision and longer operative times. with the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to breast surgery, the necessity of localizing both a breast lesion and an axillary lymph node previously biopsied is becoming frequent. CASE: A 44 year-old woman underwent neoadjuvant chmotherapy for a breast cancer the did not express estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, or HER2 receptor. In establishing the extent of disease, a suspicious ipsilateral lymph node was biopsied and found to contain metastatic disease. She had an excellent response to the chemotherapy, with decreased size of the primary tumor and the previously biopsied lymph node. The patient desired breast conservation. The primary tumor and associated calcifications were bracketed using two different Smartclips™, with a third localizing the lymph node biopsied.

conclusionThis report illustrates how the use of three SmartClips™, within the EnVisioTM system, allowed for separate tracking of each "seed" throughout a complex surgery in a patient following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This resulted in successful resection of both the tumor and the tagged lymph node.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAdultFemaleHumansLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesMastectomyNeoadjuvant Therapybreast localizationtagged axillary dissectiontagged lymph nodewireless localization

Identifiers

PMID35940632
PMCPMC9875611
OpenAlexW4295705303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.