Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35940629›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2022

Engage, understand, listen and act: evaluation of Community Panels to privilege First Nations voices in pandemic planning and response in Australia.

Kristy Crooks, Kylie Taylor, Charlee Law, Sandra Campbell, Adrian Miller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Culturally Informed Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Evaluations: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kristy CrooksMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Northern Territory, Australia kristy.crooks@students.cdu.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-7010-2473
Kylie TaylorPopulation Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Tamworth, New South Wales, Australia.
Charlee LawPopulation Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, Australia.
Sandra CampbellCollege of Nursing and Midwifery, Charles Darwin University, Casuarina, Northern Territory, Australia.
Adrian MillerOffice of Indigenous Engagement, Central Queensland University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Charles Darwin University · AUHunter New England Local Health District · AUCentral Queensland University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFirst Nations Peoples of Australia have not been included in the development nor prioritised in pre-2009 pandemic plans despite being a priority population in Australian health policy. Marginalised groups experience amplified barriers and systemic disadvantage in emergencies, however, their voices have not been heard in past pandemic responses. Through effective engagement with disadvantaged and oppressed groups, health authorities can gain a deeper understanding of how to design and implement pandemic control strategies. There have been limited studies with First Nations Peoples that has focused on pandemic planning and response strategies. Deliberative inclusive approaches such as citizens juries have been a way to uncover public perceptions.

methodsQualitative thematic research methods were used to conduct the study. We convened five First Nations Community Panels in three locations in Australia between 2019 and 2020. We used an Indigenist research approach, community-based Participatory Action Research framework and 'yarning' to understand whether Community Panels were an acceptable and appropriate way of engaging First Nations Peoples. Forty First Nations participants were purposively recruited through local and cultural networks. Panels heard evidence supporting various pandemic response strategies, and cross-questioned public health experts.

resultsAll 40 participants from the 5 panels verbally indicated strong support of the Community Panels approach as an effective way of engaging First Nations Peoples in making decisions about pandemic planning and response strategies. The main theme of 'respect' centred on the overarching principle that First Nations Peoples are important in the context of continuation of culture and ongoing political resistance.

conclusionFirst Nations Community Panels are a way of enabling active participation of First Nations peoples, increasing knowledge and understanding, and a way for government and policymakers to respectfully listen to First Nations opinions and values.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchPandemicsAustraliaHealth PolicyHumansPublic HealthCOVID-19health policyhealth systemspublic healthqualitative study

Identifiers

PMID35940629
PMCPMC9364039
OpenAlexW4290672785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.