Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35940567›Full record

Trial reportClinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases2023

Daily tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine and hydroxychloroquine for pre-exposure prophylaxis of COVID-19: a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial in healthcare workers.

Rosa Polo, Xabier García-Albéniz, Carolina Terán, Miguel Morales, David Rial-Crestelo, M Angeles Garcinuño, Miguel García Del Toro, César Hita, Juan Luis Gómez-Sirvent, Luis Buzón and 18 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Rosa PoloDivision for HIV, STI, Viral Hepatitis and TB Control, Ministry of Health, Madrid, Spain.
Xabier García-AlbénizCAUSALab, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; RTI Health Solutions, Barcelona, Spain.
Carolina TeránFacultad de Medicina Universidad Mayor, Real y Pontificia de San Francisco Xavier de Chuquisaca, Hospital Santa Bárbara, Sucre, Bolivia.
Miguel MoralesHospital Militar Dr. Carlos Arvelo, Caracas, Venezuela.
David Rial-CresteloHospital Doce de Octubre, Madrid, Spain; CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
M Angeles GarcinuñoHospital Nuestra Señora de Sonsoles, Ávila, Spain.
Miguel García Del ToroHospital General de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
César HitaHospital de Torrejón, Madrid, Spain.
Juan Luis Gómez-SirventHospital Universitario de Canarias, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.
Luis BuzónHospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, Spain.
Alberto Díaz de SantiagoHospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain.
Jose Pérez ArellanoHospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria, Gran Canaria, Spain.
Jesus SanzCIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
Pablo BachillerHospital General de Segovia, Segovia, Spain.
Elisa Martínez AlfaroComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete, Albacete, Spain.
Vicente Díaz-BritoParc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain.
Mar MasiáCIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Alicante, Spain.
Alicia Hernández-TorresHospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain.
Jose M GuerraHospital Universitario de León, León, Spain.
Jesús SantosHospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria de Málaga, Málaga, Spain.
Piedad ArazoHospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain.
Leopoldo MuñozComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de Granada, Granada, Spain.
Jose Ramon ArribasCIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.
Pablo Martínez de SalazarCenter for Communicable Disease Dynamics, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Santiago MorenoCIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Miguel A HernánCAUSALab, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Julia Del AmoDivision for HIV, STI, Viral Hepatitis and TB Control, Ministry of Health, Madrid, Spain; CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: jamo@sanidad.gob.es.
EPICOS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the effect of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) as pre-exposure prophylaxis on COVID-19 risk.

methodsEPICOS is a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial conducted in Spain, Bolivia, and Venezuela. Healthcare workers with negative SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG test were randomly assigned to the following: daily TDF/FTC plus HCQ for 12 weeks, TDF/FTC plus HCQ placebo, HCQ plus TDF/FTC placebo, and TDF/FTC placebo plus HCQ placebo. Randomization was performed in groups of four. Primary outcome was laboratory-confirmed, symptomatic COVID-19. We also studied any (symptomatic or asymptomatic) COVID-19. We compared group-specific 14-week risks via differences and ratios with 95% CIs.

resultsOf 1002 individuals screened, 926 (92.4%) were eligible and there were 14 cases of symptomatic COVID-19: 220 were assigned to the TDF/FTC plus HCQ group (3 cases), 231 to the TDF/FTC placebo plus HCQ group (3 cases), 233 to the TDF/FTC plus HCQ placebo group (3 cases), and 223 to the double placebo group (5 cases). Compared with the double placebo group, 14-week risk ratios (95% CI) of symptomatic COVID-19 were 0.39 (0.00-1.98) for TDF + HCQ, 0.34 (0.00-2.06) for TDF, and 0.49 (0.00-2.29) for HCQ. Corresponding risk ratios of any COVID-19 were 0.51 (0.21-1.00) for TDF + HCQ, 0.81 (0.44-1.49) for TDF, and 0.73 (0.41-1.38) for HCQ. Adverse events were generally mild. DISCUSSION: The target sample size was not met. Our findings are compatible with both benefit and harm of pre-exposure prophylaxis with TDF/FTC and HCQ, alone or in combination, compared with placebo.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsCOVID-19HIV InfectionsOrganophosphonatesPre-Exposure ProphylaxisAdenineCOVID-19 Drug TreatmentDeoxycytidineDouble-Blind MethodEmtricitabineHealth PersonnelHumansHydroxychloroquineSARS-CoV-2TenofovirAdenineAnti-HIV AgentsDeoxycytidineEmtricitabineHydroxychloroquineOrganophosphonatesTenofovirCOVID-19Pre-exposure prophylaxisRandomized clinical trialSARS-CoV-2Tenofovir

Identifiers

PMID35940567
PMCPMC9352647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.