Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35940085›Full record

ArticlePhysical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine2022

Reduction of risk factors for ACL Re-injuries using an innovative biofeedback approach: A phase I randomized clinical trial.

Alexander T Peebles, Thomas K Miller, Jyoti Savla, Thomas Ollendick, Stephen P Messier, Robin M Queen

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03273673 (Reduction of Risk Factors for ACL Re-injuries Using an Innovative Biofeedback Approach), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03273673 nacompletednot on this map

Reduction of Risk Factors for ACL Re-injuries Using an Innovative Biofeedback Approach

TypeinterventionalSponsorVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityRan2018 to 2020Enrolled40ConditionsAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuryArmsBiofeedback Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander T PeeblesGranata Biomechanics Lab, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA; Department of Engineering, Laurel Ridge Community College, Warrenton, VA, USA.
Thomas K MillerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA, USA.
Jyoti SavlaDepartment of Human Development and Family Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Thomas OllendickDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Tech Child Study Center, VVirginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Stephen P MessierJ.B. Snow Biomechanics Laboratory, Department of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA; Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA; Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Robin M QueenGranata Biomechanics Lab, Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA, USA. Electronic address: rmqueen@vt.edu.
Virginia Tech · USCarilion Clinic · USVirginia Tech - Wake Forest University School of Biomedical Engineering & Sciences · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

Reduction of Risk Factors for ACL Re-injuries using an Innovative Biofeedback ApproachR21AR069865 · NIAMS · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI QUEEN, ROBIN M · 2017 to 2019
$528k
NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR069865
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDetermine the safety and initial efficacy of a novel biofeedback intervention to improve landing mechanics in patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

methodsForty patients post-ACLR (age: 16.9 ± 2.0 years) were randomly allocated to a biofeedback intervention or an attention control group. Patients in the biofeedback group completed 12 sessions over six-weeks that included bilateral unweighted squats with visual and tactile biofeedback. Patients in the control group completed a six-week educational program. Lower extremity mechanics were collected during a bilateral stop jump at baseline, six-weeks, and 12-weeks post-intervention. Linear mixed-effects models adjusted for sex and graft type determined the main effects of and interactions between group and time.

resultsNo group by time interaction existed for peak knee extension moment symmetry. A group by time interaction existed for peak vertical ground reaction force symmetry (p = 0.012), where patients in the biofeedback group had greater improvements in symmetry between baseline and post-intervention that were not maintained through the retention assessments.

conclusionThis novel biofeedback program did not reduce risk factors for second ACL injuries. Future work could develop and test multidisciplinary interventions for reducing second ACL injury risk factors. CLINICALTRIALS: GOV IDENTIFIER: (NCT03273673).

Indexed as

ACLBiofeedbackBiomechanicsPhysical therapyRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID35940085
PMCPMC12643204
OpenAlexW4285605486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.