Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35939957›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials advances2022

How safe are magnetic nanomotors: From cells to animals.

Reshma Vasantha Ramachandran, Anaxee Barman, Paramita Modak, Ramray Bhat, Ambarish Ghosh, Deepak Kumar Saini

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Reshma Vasantha RamachandranCentre for Biosystems Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India.
Anaxee BarmanCentre for Nano Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India.
Paramita ModakCentre for Nano Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India.
Ramray BhatCentre for Biosystems Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India; Department of Molecular Reproduction, Development and Genetics, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India.
Ambarish GhoshCentre for Nano Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India; Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India.
Deepak Kumar SainiCentre for Biosystems Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India; Department of Molecular Reproduction, Development and Genetics, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India. Electronic address: deepaksaini@iisc.ac.in.
Indian Institute of Science Bangalore · IN

Funding

DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/I/17/2/503312DBT-Wellcome Trust India Alliance IA/S/19/2/504655Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Helical magnetic nanomotors can be actuated using an external magnetic field and have potential applications in drug delivery, colloidal manipulation, and bio-microrheology. Recently, they have been maneuvered in biological environments such as vitreous humour, dentinal tubules, peritoneal fluid, stromal matrix, and blood, which are promising developments for clinical applications. However, their biocompatibility and biodistribution are vital parameters that must be assessed before further use. An extensive quantitative evaluation has been performed for these parameters for the first time through in vitro and in vivo experiments. Investigations of cell death, proliferation, and DNA damage ascertain that the motors are non-toxic. Also, an unbiased transcriptomic analysis affirms that the motors are not genotoxic till 20 motors/ cell. Toxicity studies in mice reveal that the motors show no signs of toxicity up to a dose of 55 mg/ kg body weight. Further, the biodistribution studies show that they remain in the blood circulation after injection and at later stages possibly adhere to the walls of the blood vessel because of adsorption. However, perfusion with physiological saline decreases this adsorption/adhesion. Overall, we demonstrate the biocompatibility of nanomotors in live cellular and organismal systems, and a systemic biodistribution analysis reveals organ-specific retention of motors.

Indexed as

Magnetic FieldsMagneticsAnimalsMiceTissue DistributionBiocompatibilityBiodistributionMagnetic actuationMicromotorsNanomotorsToxicity

Identifiers

PMID35939957
PMCPMC7614616
OpenAlexW4289528794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.