Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35939778›Full record

ArticleJCO oncology practice2022

Disparities in Psychosocial Distress Screening and Management of Lung and Ovarian Cancer Survivors.

Elizabeth A Rohan, M Shayne Gallaway, Grace C Huang, Diane Ng, Jennifer E Boehm, Ruvini Samarasinha, Karen Stachon

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO oncology practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth A RohanDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.ORCID 0000-0002-2239-9871
M Shayne GallawayArizona Department of Public Health, Phoenix, AZ.ORCID 0000-0002-7026-2300
Grace C HuangWestat, Rockville, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-8512-3848
Diane NgWestat, Rockville, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-8429-4194
Jennifer E BoehmDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Ruvini SamarasinhaDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.ORCID 0000-0002-9017-3794
Karen StachonAmerican College of Surgeons, Commission on Cancer, Chicago, IL.ORCID 0000-0003-2520-0044
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USWestat (United States) · USAmerican College of Surgeons · US

Funding

CDC HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSince 2016, the American College of Surgeons' Commission on Cancer (CoC) has required routine distress screening (DS) of cancer survivors treated in their accredited facilities to facilitate early identification of survivors with psychosocial concerns. Lung and ovarian cancer survivors have relatively low 5-year survival rates and may experience high levels of distress. We examined the extent to which ovarian and lung cancer survivors received CoC-mandated DS and whether DS disparities exist on the basis of diagnosis, sociodemographic factors, or facility geography (urban/rural).

methodsThis study included a quantitative review of DS documentation and follow-up services provided using existing electronic health records (EHRs). We worked with 21 CoC-accredited facilities across the United States and examined EHRs of 2,258 survivors from these facilities (1,618 lung cancer survivors and 640 ovarian cancer survivors) diagnosed in 2016 or 2017.

resultsDocumentation of DS was found in half (54.8%) of the EHRs reviewed. Disparities existed across race/ethnicity, cancer type and stage, and facility characteristics. Hispanic/Latino and Asian/Pacific Islander survivors were screened at lower percentages than other survivors. Patients with ovarian cancer, those diagnosed at earlier stages, and survivors in urban facilities had relatively low percentages of DS. Non-Hispanic Black survivors were more likely than non-Hispanic White survivors to decline further psychosocial services.

conclusionDespite the mandate for routine DS in CoC-accredited oncology programs, gaps remain in how many and which survivors are screened for distress. Improvements in DS processes to enhance access to DS and appropriate psychosocial care could benefit cancer survivors. Collaboration with CoC during this study led to improvement of their processes for collecting DS data for measuring standard adherence.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsOvarian NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansLungMedical OncologyUnited States

Identifiers

PMID35939778
PMCPMC9835932
OpenAlexW4290724851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.