Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35939684›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Chang Hyun Song, Young Ho Kim, Manisha Naskar, Byron W Hayes, Mathew A Abraham, Joo Hwan Noh, Gyeongseo Suk, Min Jung Kim, Kyu Sang Cho, Minhye Shin and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. UropathogenicAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Fabrication of bioprints self-coated with thermally sensitive lactobacilli for CAUTI applications.European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. BTS1-knockoutFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Draft genome sequences of threeMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Chang Hyun SongDivision of Life Sciences, Korea University, Seoul, 02841, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2647-7312
Young Ho KimDepartment of Urology, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon-si, 14584, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3959-0928
Manisha NaskarDivision of Life Sciences, Korea University, Seoul, 02841, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7787-947X
Byron W HayesDepartment of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.ORCID 0000-0002-6827-3123
Mathew A AbrahamDepartment of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.
Joo Hwan NohDivision of Life Sciences, Korea University, Seoul, 02841, South Korea.
Gyeongseo SukDivision of Life Sciences, Korea University, Seoul, 02841, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4537-8774
Min Jung KimDivision of Life Sciences, Korea University, Seoul, 02841, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2168-278X
Kyu Sang ChoDivision of Life Sciences, Korea University, Seoul, 02841, South Korea.
Minhye ShinDepartment of Microbiology, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, 22212, South Korea.
Eun-Jin LeeDivision of Life Sciences, Korea University, Seoul, 02841, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5078-1974
Soman N AbrahamDepartment of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.
Hae Woong ChoiDivision of Life Sciences, Korea University, Seoul, 02841, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9372-1875
Korea University · KRDuke Medical Center · USInha University · KRSoonchunhyang University · KR

Funding

Duke KURe ProgramK12DK100024 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Cindy Amundsen · 2013 to 2026
$8.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS K12 DK100024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many urinary tract infections (UTIs) are recurrent because uropathogens persist within the bladder epithelial cells (BECs) for extended periods between bouts of infection. Because persistent uropathogens are intracellular, they are often refractive to antibiotic treatment. The recent discovery of endogenous

Indexed as

AntibiosisEscherichia coli InfectionsInterferon Type ILactobacillus crispatusUrinary BladderUrinary Tract InfectionsUropathogenic Escherichia coliAnimalsBiological TherapyCathepsin DFemaleHumansImmunity, InnateMaleMiceCathepsin DInterferon Type Icommensal bacteriaLactobacillitype I interferonurinary tract infection

Identifiers

PMID35939684
PMCPMC9388105
OpenAlexW4290725156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.