Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35939677›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Insectivorous bats form mobile sensory networks to optimize prey localization: The case of the common noctule bat.

Manuel Roeleke, Ulrike E Schlägel, Cara Gallagher, Jan Pufelski, Torsten Blohm, Ran Nathan, Sivan Toledo, Florian Jeltsch, Christian C Voigt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Onboard recordings reveal how bats maneuver under severe acoustic interference.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Manuel RoelekePlant Ecology and Nature Conservation, University of Potsdam, 14469 Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5298-8071
Ulrike E SchlägelPlant Ecology and Nature Conservation, University of Potsdam, 14469 Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6640-9042
Cara GallagherPlant Ecology and Nature Conservation, University of Potsdam, 14469 Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7094-1752
Jan PufelskiPlant Ecology and Nature Conservation, University of Potsdam, 14469 Potsdam, Germany.
Torsten BlohmPrivate Researcher, 17291 Prenzlau, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4004-4257
Ran NathanMovement Ecology Laboratory, Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, 9190501 Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-5733-6715
Sivan ToledoBlavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, 6997801 Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-9524-7115
Florian JeltschPlant Ecology and Nature Conservation, University of Potsdam, 14469 Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4670-6469
Christian C VoigtDepartment of Evolutionary Ecology, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, 10315 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0706-3974

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals that depend on ephemeral, patchily distributed prey often use public information to locate resource patches. The use of public information can lead to the aggregation of foragers at prey patches, a mechanism known as local enhancement. However, when ephemeral resources are distributed over large areas, foragers may also need to increase search efficiency, and thus apply social strategies when sampling the landscape. While sensory networks of visually oriented animals have already been confirmed, we lack an understanding of how acoustic eavesdropping adds to the formation of sensory networks. Here we radio-tracked a total of 81 aerial-hawking bats at very high spatiotemporal resolution during five sessions over 3 y, recording up to 19 individuals simultaneously. Analyses of interactive flight behavior provide conclusive evidence that bats form temporary mobile sensory networks by adjusting their movements to neighboring conspecifics while probing the airspace for prey. Complementary agent-based simulations confirmed that the observed movement patterns can lead to the formation of mobile sensory networks, and that bats located prey faster when networking than when relying only on local enhancement or searching solitarily. However, the benefit of networking diminished with decreasing group size. The combination of empirical analyses and simulations elucidates how animal groups use acoustic information to efficiently locate unpredictable and ephemeral food patches. Our results highlight that declining local populations of social foragers may thus suffer from Allee effects that increase the risk of collapses under global change scenarios, like insect decline and habitat degradation.

Indexed as

ChiropteraEulipotyphlaPredatory BehaviorAnimalsEcholocationEcosystemFlight, Animalautomated radio trackingephemeralitygroup foragingsimulationsociality

Identifiers

PMID35939677
PMCPMC9388074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.