Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35939575›Full record

ArticleThe Permanente journal2022

Where Is Research in the Era of Electronic Health Records?

Christina Sze, Vahan Simonyan, Art Sedrakyan, Bilal Chughtai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Permanente journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christina SzeDepartment of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College/New York Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA.
Vahan SimonyanCenter for Biologics Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Art SedrakyanDepartment of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA.
Bilal ChughtaiDepartment of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College/New York Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0515-2578

Funding

Novel Approaches to Advance Coordinated Registry Networks (CRNs).U01FD006936 · FDA · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI SEDRAKYAN, ART · 2020 to 2022
$2.1M
FDA HHS U01 FD006936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IntroductionData extraction from electronic health records (EHRs) for use in clinical research continues to be labor-intensive and to offer little benefit over traditional paper chart reviews. This is largely due to poor integration of EHR systems with hospital process flow, which still relies heavily on traditional paperwork as a means of documentation. DiscussionNew methods in data collection through mobile applications have streamlined data entry through better data standardization and improved overall data quality. However, mobile applications address only a portion of the problem. Data entry errors and legacy integration will continue to be an issue when there are changes between practitioners with different EHR systems. The combination of a mobile application with the cloud platform has been applied in multiple specialties to monitor recovery and patient-reported outcomes. ConclusionMobile applications along with a virtual cloud environment to host data provide a reasonable solution for consolidating patient data and can accelerate population research.

Indexed as

DocumentationElectronic Health RecordsHumanscloudelectronic health recordmobile applicationvirtual

Identifiers

PMID35939575
PMCPMC9683739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.