Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35939440›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

High resolution DLP stereolithography to fabricate biocompatible hydroxyapatite structures that support osteogenesis.

Jessica S Martinez, Sara Peterson, Cathleen A Hoel, Daniel J Erno, Tony Murray, Linda Boyd, Jae-Hyuk Her, Nathan Mclean, Robert Davis, Fiona Ginty and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Nano-Based 3D Printed Scaffold for Bone Tissue Engineering.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Mechanobiological optimization of scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jessica S MartinezGE Research, Niskayuna, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0530-5770
Sara PetersonGE Research, Niskayuna, New York, United States of America.
Cathleen A HoelGE Research, Niskayuna, New York, United States of America.
Daniel J ErnoGE Research, Niskayuna, New York, United States of America.
Tony MurrayGE Research, Niskayuna, New York, United States of America.
Linda BoydGE Research, Niskayuna, New York, United States of America.
Jae-Hyuk HerGE Research, Niskayuna, New York, United States of America.
Nathan McleanGE Research, Niskayuna, New York, United States of America.
Robert DavisGE Research, Niskayuna, New York, United States of America.
Fiona GintyGE Research, Niskayuna, New York, United States of America.
Steven J DuclosGE Research, Niskayuna, New York, United States of America.
Brian M DavisGE Research, Niskayuna, New York, United States of America.
Gautam ParthasarathyGE Research, Niskayuna, New York, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lithography based additive manufacturing techniques, specifically digital light processing (DLP), are considered innovative manufacturing techniques for orthopaedic implants because of their potential for construction of complex geometries using polymers, metals, and ceramics. Hydroxyapatite (HA) coupons, printed using DLP, were evaluated for biological performance in supporting viability, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation of the human cell line U2OS and human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) up to 35 days in culture to determine feasibility for future use in development of complex scaffold geometries. Contact angle, profilometry, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) measurements showed the HA coupons to be hydrophilic, porous, and having micro size surface roughness, all within favourable cell culture ranges. The study found no impact of leachable and extractables form the DLP printing process. Cells seeded on coupons exhibited morphologies comparable to conventional tissue culture polystyrene plates. Cell proliferation rates, as determined by direct cell count and the RealTime-GloTM MT Cell Viability Assay, were similar on HA coupons and standard tissue culture polystyrene plates). Osteogenic differentiation of human MSCs on HA coupons was confirmed using alkaline phosphatase, Alizarin Red S and von Kossa staining. The morphology of MSCs cultured in osteogenic medium for 14 to 35 days was similar on HA coupons and tissue culture polystyrene plates, with osteogenic (geometric, cuboidal morphology with dark nodules) and adipogenic (lipid vesicles and deposits) features. We conclude that the DLP process and LithaBone HA400 slurry are biocompatible and are suitable for osteogenic applications. Coupons served as an effective evaluation design in the characterization and visualization of cell responses on DLP printed HA material. Results support the feasibility of future technical development for 3D printing of sophisticated scaffold designs, which can be constructed to meet the mechanical, chemical, and porosity requirements of an artificial bone scaffold.

Indexed as

DurapatiteOsteogenesisCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCells, CulturedHumansPolystyrenesStereolithographyTissue ScaffoldsDurapatitePolystyrenes

Identifiers

PMID35939440
PMCPMC9359536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.