ArticlePloS one2022
COVID-19 market disruptions and food security: Evidence from households in rural Liberia and Malawi.
Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of a single cash transfer on school re-enrollment during COVID-19 among vulnerable adolescent girls in Kenya: Randomized controlled trial.Economics of education review · 2023Article
- The effects of emergency government cash transfers on beliefs and behaviours during the COVID pandemic: Evidence from Brazil.Journal of economic behavior & organization · 2023Article
- Analyzing households' food insecurity during the COVID-19 pandemic and the role of public policies to mitigate it: evidence from Ceará, Brazil.Global health promotion · 2023Article
- Can phone surveys be representative in low- and middle-income countries? An application to Myanmar.PloS one · 2023Article
- Panel data evidence on the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on livelihoods in urban Côte d'Ivoire.PloS one · 2023Article
- Adapting to an aggregate shock: The impact of the Covid-19 crisis on rural households.Review of economics of the household · 2023Article
- A new face of food security: A global perspective of the COVID-19 pandemic.Progress in disaster science · 2022Article
- Food insecurity during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in four African countries.Food policy · 2022Article
- Income shock and food insecurity prediction Vietnam under the pandemic.World development · 2022Article
- Perceived effects of COVID-19 restrictions on smallholder farmers: Evidence from seven lower- and middle-income countries.Agricultural systems · 2022Article
- Food insecurity and COVID-19 risk in low- and middle-income countries.Applied economic perspectives and policy · 2022Article
- THE IMPACT OF EMERGENCY CASH ASSISTANCE IN A PANDEMIC: EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FROM COLOMBIA.The review of economics and statistics · 2022Article
- The COVID-19 pandemic and food security in low- and middle-income countries: a review.Agriculture & food security · 2022Review
- Global assessment of the impacts of COVID-19 on food security.Global food security · 2021Article
- COVID-19-Induced Disruptions of School Feeding Services Exacerbate Food Insecurity in Nigeria.The Journal of nutrition · 2021Article
- Health and Economic Outcomes Associated With COVID-19 in Women at High Risk of HIV Infection in Rural Kenya.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- The coronavirus pandemic and food security: Evidence from Mali.Food policy · 2021Article
- COVID-19 and food security: Panel data evidence from Nigeria.Food policy · 2021Article
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on agricultural production, livelihoods, and food security in India: baseline results of a phone survey.Food security · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We use data collected from panel phone surveys to document the changes in food security of households in rural Liberia and Malawi during the market disruptions associated with the COVID-19 lockdowns in 2020. We use two distinct empirical approaches in our analysis: (a) an event study around the date of the lockdowns (March to July 2020), and (b) a difference-in-differences analysis comparing the lockdown period in 2020 to the same months in 2021, in order to attempt to control for seasonality. In both countries, market activity was severely disrupted and we observe declines in expenditures. However, we find no evidence of declines in food security.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.